2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21134556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esophagus Segmentation in CT Images via Spatial Attention Network and STAPLE Algorithm

Abstract: One essential step in radiotherapy treatment planning is the organ at risk of segmentation in Computed Tomography (CT). Many recent studies have focused on several organs such as the lung, heart, esophagus, trachea, liver, aorta, kidney, and prostate. However, among the above organs, the esophagus is one of the most difficult organs to segment because of its small size, ambiguous boundary, and very low contrast in CT images. To address these challenges, we propose a fully automated framework for the esophagus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, refs. [43,44] integrate attention modules in their deep neural network to solve segmentation tasks such as esophagus and lungs in medical images. Motivated by channel attention, we improved the localization mask by adopting an attention mechanism to focus on the important channels.…”
Section: Attention Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, refs. [43,44] integrate attention modules in their deep neural network to solve segmentation tasks such as esophagus and lungs in medical images. Motivated by channel attention, we improved the localization mask by adopting an attention mechanism to focus on the important channels.…”
Section: Attention Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al [ 33 ] proposed channel attention U-Net to segment esophageal cancer with a higher Dice value. Tran et al [ 34 ] proposed a novel U-Net with an attention mechanism combined and STA-PLEalgorithm to achieve esophagus segmentation using 3D images. An overview comparison of the methods for esophageal lesion segmentation is shown in Table 2 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies have explored the effect of clinical segmentation variability on algorithm training, and defined methods to quantify and identify meaningful variation at the individual clinician level. Most of the work to date regarding esophageal segmentation has focused on improving the overall performance of segmentation models by proposing innovative model architectures and evaluating methods using a limited number of test cases 13 , 14 . Their training data were acquired directly from the clinic without standardization in terms of segmentation inconsistency 13 – 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%