This current research aims at revealing factual ESP practitioners' roles at the tertiary level of education in Malang City, Indonesia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and a survey using questionnaires involving 22 ESP practitioners selected randomly from several universities and colleges in Malang. To collect data on the roles of ESP practitioners, the present study adopted two sources in the questionnaires: First, the roles of ESP instructors as teachers, course designers, materials providers, researchers, and evaluators as proposed by Dudley-Evans and St. John (1998), and secondly as a practitioner who has intercultural competence and professional activity competence as defined by Luka (2004) and ethnography (Wall, 2014). The findings showed that the majority (70%) of ESP practitioners realized their roles and some (30%) claimed to learn more on mastering contents, providing materials, conducting research on needs analysis, learning intercultural competence, and realizing the needs to have experiences in industries or related work places of the students. Concerning their ethnography, the majority of ESP practitioners did not have the opportunity to teach, to have internship, and to work in industries. Only 2 (9.1%) ESP practitioners studied the field of what students learn. Future research on the collaboration between academics and practitioners is needed to make ESP classrooms a 'real world'.Keywords: ESP practitioners, role, tertiary level, ethnography, workplace
INTRODUCTIONThe marginalizing of English for Specific Purposes (henceforth ESP) at the university level in the Indonesian context is obviously observable in the credit load of ESP courses. The course offers only 2-4 credits in the English Department and the nonEnglish Department, and 6-8 credits at the colleges. Studies on the implementation of teaching English atnon English departments conducted in Java and Sumatra as observed by Sulistyo (2008) revealed the undesirable sides of the teaching of English that are associated with the teaching of ESP. Another study by Sulistyo (2013) also revealed that college students' readiness in academic content area reading was low. It is argued that this empirical evidence is related among other things to the marginalizing of ESP at the university level.With the growth of English as a lingua franca, where English is limited to being used as a means of not only general communication but also commerce, aviation, logistics, accounting, engineering, health, and tourism, the teaching condition of ESP described previously should not happen, as English will also be used in other sectors soon. This implies that ESP is supposed to get more attention in terms of optimizing ESP practitioners' role in the classrooms.It might be not too far-fetching to state that for some decades English for specific purpose (ESP) has been marginalized in English language teaching (henceforth ELT), at the English Department and the non-English Department in Indonesia. This is due to