1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00745816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESR of hydrazyl radicals in frozen solutions and glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, the result presented in this paper should be considered as a benchmark for further studies, and expected with increasing Larmor frequency and was indeed 210 COMMUNICATIONS experimentally observed (17, 18). This is exactly what hap-spectra is on the order of 0.94 mT and similar to that obtained from the X-band experiments (19,20). As expected in a pens in our experiment between the X band and the Q band and tells us that in that frequency range we are in a regime solution spectrum, the g-factor anisotropy remains averaged out by the Brownian motions and molecular tumbling.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In any case, the result presented in this paper should be considered as a benchmark for further studies, and expected with increasing Larmor frequency and was indeed 210 COMMUNICATIONS experimentally observed (17, 18). This is exactly what hap-spectra is on the order of 0.94 mT and similar to that obtained from the X-band experiments (19,20). As expected in a pens in our experiment between the X band and the Q band and tells us that in that frequency range we are in a regime solution spectrum, the g-factor anisotropy remains averaged out by the Brownian motions and molecular tumbling.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…In fact, Fig. 1 illustrates well the usefulness of this standard: in both over the aromatic rings as determined by polarized neutron diffraction (19), EPR (20,21), and ENDOR (21) data. In spectra, the magnetic field is calculated from the nonpersistent sweep coil current added to the persistent current in the the first case, the calculated second moment M 2 was 166.02 mT 2 and in the second case it was 749.79 mT 2 .…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To calculate selection rules and to ascertain whether the mentioned points are those of band extremums, it is necessary to know irreducible representations of wavevector groups. The irreducible representations of the wavevector groups can be found using the method of projective representations [1,3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The merging and duplication of representations are caused by the invariance with respect to the time inversion and governed by the Herring criterion [4]. The projective representations for Λ, S, V, Σ, Δ, W, and U points depend on the wavevector [3]. Their evolution in certain direction can be pictured graphically as shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%