2013
DOI: 10.1515/crelle.2012.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Essential dimension of algebraic tori

Abstract: Abstract. The essential dimension is a numerical invariant of an algebraic group G which may be thought of as a measure of complexity of G-torsors over fields. A recent theorem of N. Karpenko and A. Merkurjev gives a simple formula for the essential dimension of a finite p-group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The details (namely, the proofs of Propositions 4.2 and 4.3) will be supplied in the next two sections. The starting point of our argument is [LMMR,Theorem 3.1], which we reproduce as Theorem 4.1 below for the reader's convenience.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theorem: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The details (namely, the proofs of Propositions 4.2 and 4.3) will be supplied in the next two sections. The starting point of our argument is [LMMR,Theorem 3.1], which we reproduce as Theorem 4.1 below for the reader's convenience.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theorem: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume the contrary. Then by [LMMR,Lemma 2.6] there exists a surjective homomorphism f : P → X(T ) of Gal(k sep /k)-lattices, where P is permutation and rank P = dim T . This implies that f has finite kernel and hence, is injective.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theorem: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let γ ′ ∈ H 1 (F ′ , U Φ ) be the corresponding class of U Φ -torsors over F ′ under the isomorphism H 1 (F ′ , U Φ ) ≃ Br p s F ′ (Φ)/F ′ by (7). As γ is a generic U Φ -torsor, there exists an F ′ -morphism v : Spec F ′ → V Φ such that v * (γ) = γ ′ and Im(v) ⊂ W (see Section 2.3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%