1987
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.50.11.1435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Essential tremor: electrophysiological and pharmacological evidence for a subdivision.

Abstract: SUMMARY Forty five patients with essential tremor have been investigated by means of clinical examination, polygraphic EMG records and testing of long-latency reflexes. Clinically there were no differences between the patients, whereas the electrophysiological investigations suggested two subtypes. One group of patients may be characterised by normal long-latency reflexes and synchronous tremor bursts in antagonists or activity of the antigravity muscle alone. The second group had abnormal long-latency reflexe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar explanation can account for the observation that the PD group showed significantly lower values of the standard deviation of the phase, compared to patients with ET. The predominant opinion regarding activation pattern is that the alternating activity is characteristic for PD and the synchronous activity is characteristic for ET [13,20,28], although both forms of activation have been found in either condition [4,12,26]. To our surprise, the mean phase accounting for the predominant activation pattern was not significantly different between both groups, although a tendency towards clustering of the mean phase around 180 degrees was observed in PD, suggesting an alternating pattern of contraction.…”
Section: ■ Phase Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar explanation can account for the observation that the PD group showed significantly lower values of the standard deviation of the phase, compared to patients with ET. The predominant opinion regarding activation pattern is that the alternating activity is characteristic for PD and the synchronous activity is characteristic for ET [13,20,28], although both forms of activation have been found in either condition [4,12,26]. To our surprise, the mean phase accounting for the predominant activation pattern was not significantly different between both groups, although a tendency towards clustering of the mean phase around 180 degrees was observed in PD, suggesting an alternating pattern of contraction.…”
Section: ■ Phase Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Initially, the activation pattern of the antagonistic muscles, as one can determine by visual inspection of the EMG, was shown to reveal an alternating behavior in PD in contrast to synchronous activity in ET [28]. Meanwhile, both forms of muscle activation have been found in either condition [12,23,26], and switches between these activation patterns were detected in one and the same patient [4,13]. Waveform analysis reflecting asymmetries of the tremor curves seemed to be a promising tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deuschl et al (15) reported 16 of 45 patients with essential tremor who had enhanced C-reflex. In their study, it was also demonstrated that tremors of those patients were responsive to primidone rather than propranolol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,18 Moreover, monosynaptic spinal and long-latency stretch reflexes are invariably normal in ET. 9 Other evidence favors a central generator in ET. Several studies in patients with ET have shown abnormal activation of the central nervous system; for example, the cerebellum, the thalamus, and the medulla.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%