2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1120-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Essential value of cocaine and food in rats: tests of the exponential model of demand

Abstract: The exponential model of demand accommodated the data variance for all cocaine and food demand curves. Compared to food, cocaine is a good of lower essential value.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
86
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
14
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This preference shift occurred regardless of the dose of cocaine available and even following a long history of extended access to cocaine self-administration Cantin et al 2010). These findings are generally consistent with previous research (Carroll et al 1989;Carroll and Lac 1993) and with recent behavioral economics studies showing that food (or sucrose) demand was more inelastic than cocaine demand (Christensen et al 2008; Koffarnus and Woods 2011; for review, see Kearns et al 2011). They are also congruent with a recent study showing that mice preferred drinking sucrose over direct optostimulation of midbrain dopamine neurons (Domingos et al 2011).…”
Section: Drug Preference Over Nondrug Rewardssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This preference shift occurred regardless of the dose of cocaine available and even following a long history of extended access to cocaine self-administration Cantin et al 2010). These findings are generally consistent with previous research (Carroll et al 1989;Carroll and Lac 1993) and with recent behavioral economics studies showing that food (or sucrose) demand was more inelastic than cocaine demand (Christensen et al 2008; Koffarnus and Woods 2011; for review, see Kearns et al 2011). They are also congruent with a recent study showing that mice preferred drinking sucrose over direct optostimulation of midbrain dopamine neurons (Domingos et al 2011).…”
Section: Drug Preference Over Nondrug Rewardssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The exponential model accounted for >90% of the variance in consumption data. This compares well with between-session procedures where the model has been used (Christensen et al, 2008). Bentzley et al (2013) recently developed a within-session demand procedure where price is manipulated by varying reinforcer magnitude (i.e., dose), rather than reinforcer cost (i.e., FR).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…A secondary goal was to evaluate the viability of a within-session demand curve procedure. In previous studies (e.g., Christensen et al, 2008), the FR was manipulated across blocks of sessions, necessitating a large amount of training to obtain a demand curve. The ability to generate a demand curve within a single session could accelerate the pace of data collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demand procedure used here was similar to that in Christensen et al (2008a). Rats were first trained to lever press for cocaine and for food on a fixed-ratio (FR) 1 schedule.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because EV is not affected by scalar properties of the reinforcer in this way, it is thought to be a purer measure or reinforcer value. A growing number of recent studies have used the exponential demand model to quantify reinforcer value (e.g., Bentzley et al 2013, 2014; Christensen et al 2008a, 2008b; Koffarnus & Woods, 2013; Lamb & Daws, 2013; Schwartz et al 2016). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%