2014
DOI: 10.4135/9781483384726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Essentials of Marketing Research: Putting Research into Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey and interview templates were based on guidelines from Clow & James (2014) and Kvale (2007), respectively. Several issues were identified when analysing the results.…”
Section: Validity Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey and interview templates were based on guidelines from Clow & James (2014) and Kvale (2007), respectively. Several issues were identified when analysing the results.…”
Section: Validity Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that a single question is not a good measure of risk perception, self-efficacy, or a set of behaviors. This is a weakness of the current study, but we mainly used dichotomous questions that are simple to understand, easy in data collection, and do not allow ambivalent answers [31]. Despite the fact that the dichotomous questions fail to capture any intensity of feeling, the aim was to cover a large number of variables as independent variables for predicting importance of personal safety and safe behavior of farmers.…”
Section: Questionnaire and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researcher usedquota sampling to ensure that the respondents in KZN were suitably represented in the study. Clow and James (2014) explain that the purpose of a quota sample is to make sure that the sample contains the same number of the characteristics identified by the researcher and it is apparent in the population being studied. Individual mobile phone users were chosen using convenience sampling based on accessibility of respondents to the researcher.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%