Establishing a baseline for surgical care in Mongolia: a situational analysis using the six indicators from the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery

Abstract

ObjectivesTo inform national planning, six indicators posed by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery were collected for the Mongolian surgical system. This situational analysis shows one lower middle-income country’s ability to collect the indicators aided by a well-developed health information system.DesignAn 11-year retrospective analysis of the Mongolian surgical system using data from the Health Development Center, National Statistics Office and Household Socio-Economic Survey. Access estimates were based on travel time to capable hospitals. Provider density, surgical volume and postoperative mortality were calculated at national and regional levels. Protection against impoverishing and catastrophic expenditures was assessed against standard out-of-pocket expenditure at government hospitals for individual operations.SettingMongolia’s 81 public hospitals with surgical capability, including tertiary, secondary and primary/secondary facilities.ParticipantsAll operative patients in Mongolia’s public hospitals, 2006–2016.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were national-level results of the indicators. Secondary outcomes include regional access; surgeons, anaesthesiologists and obstetricians (SAO) density; surgical volume; and perioperative mortality.ResultsIn 2016, 80.1% of the population had 2-hour access to essential surgery, including 60% of those outside the capital. SAO density was 47.4/100 000 population. A coding change increased surgical volume to 5784/100 000 population, and in-hospital mortality decreased from 0.27% to 0.14%. All households were financially protected from caesarean section. Appendectomy carried 99.4% and 98.4% protection, external femur fixation carried 75.4% and 50.7% protection from impoverishing and catastrophic expenditures, respectively. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy carried 42.9% protection from both.ConclusionsMongolia meets national benchmarks for access, provider density, surgical volume and postoperative mortality with notable limitations. Significant disparities exist between regions. Unequal access may be efficiently addressed by strengthening or building key district hospitals in population-dense areas. Increased financial protections are needed for operations involving hardware or technology. Ongoing monitoring and evaluation will support the development of context-specific interventions to improve surgical care in Mongolia.

Estimating access to surgical care: A community centered national household survey from Pakistan

“…Several methods of 2-hour access estimation have been proposed in the literature predominantly using some form of GIS estimates [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Compared to these studies, our approach to estimating surgical care access is novel and unique.…”

Achieving Surgical, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anesthesia (SOTA) care for all in South Asia

“…Assessing systemic and epidemiological indicators related to SOTA care for monitoring and evaluation purposes and introduction and implementation of national SOTA plans are two critical initiatives that multiple countries have invested in. Countries such as Brazil ( 4 ), Colombia ( 5 , 6 ), Mexico and Peru in Latin America ( 7 ), Somaliland ( 8 ), Madagascar ( 9 ), and Uganda ( 10 ) in Africa, and Mongolia ( 11 ) in East Asia among others around the world have conducted comprehensive high-resolution subnational mapping of indicators for informing policies, while Rwanda, Tanzania, Nigeria, and Zambia among others have committed to national SOTA care plans ( 12 ). Despite the global movement, focus on SOTA care in South Asia—one of the world’s most densely populated, culturally diverse, and economically aspirational regions—remains limited.…”