2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01389-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing a normative database for quantitative pupillometry in the pediatric population

Abstract: Background: Pupillary evaluation is a crucial element of physical exams. Noting size, reactivity, and consensual response is critical in assessing for optic nerve dysfunction. We aim to establish normative data for scotopic pupillary size and function in the pediatric population in a clinical setting. Methods: Pupillometry was obtained prospectively for consecutive, normal patients < 18 years old being evaluated by Lurie Children's Ophthalmology. Quantitative data included maximum (MAX) and minimum (MIN) diame… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding latency, we note that the PyPlr data were collected on a Windows laptop and therefore that they include on average ~59 ms timestamping error (corresponding to the average difference between the World and Eye camera timestamps in Figure 4 for OS = Windows | FPS = 120). Subtracting 59 ms from the averages for Subjects 1, 2 and 3 gives values of 242 ms, 250 ms and 226 ms, respectively, which are more plausible with respect to normative values in the literature (e.g., Shah et al, 2020;Straub et al, 1992;Winston et al, 2019).…”
Section: System For Researching the Pupil Light Reflex 28supporting
confidence: 50%
“…Regarding latency, we note that the PyPlr data were collected on a Windows laptop and therefore that they include on average ~59 ms timestamping error (corresponding to the average difference between the World and Eye camera timestamps in Figure 4 for OS = Windows | FPS = 120). Subtracting 59 ms from the averages for Subjects 1, 2 and 3 gives values of 242 ms, 250 ms and 226 ms, respectively, which are more plausible with respect to normative values in the literature (e.g., Shah et al, 2020;Straub et al, 1992;Winston et al, 2019).…”
Section: System For Researching the Pupil Light Reflex 28supporting
confidence: 50%
“…4 for OS = Windows | FPS = 120). Subtracting 59 ms from the averages for Subjects 1, 2 and 3 gives values of 242 ms, 250 ms and 226 ms, respectively, which are more plausible with respect to normative values in the literature (e.g., Shah et al, 2020 ; Straub et al, 1992 ; Winston et al, 2019 ). For the 75% metric, the discrepancy may be explained by geometrical differences in retinal stimulation: Although the stimuli were matched for a -opic irradiance and delivered monocularly, the PLR-3000 light stimulus comes from 4 small LEDs positioned close to the eye, whereas our integrating sphere system stimulates the entire visual field with reflected light.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…These changes with age are fairly correlated with changes in eye size but may also be influenced by developmental changes of the pupillary reflex. 1,5 In the study by Brown et al, there were also significant differences in pupil size and maximum constriction velocity when comparing healthy black to their respective white cohorts. Our results also reflect a variation amongst races as our data showed no significant change when comparing children with sickle cell disease to healthy black children of a similar age, but did show a significant difference amongst our participants in contrast to their white cohorts in the aforementioned study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%