2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22114080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Walking Speed in People Post Stroke

Abstract: While accelerometers could be used to monitor important domains of walking in daily living (e.g., walking speed), the interpretation of accelerometer data often relies on validation studies performed with healthy participants. The aim of this study was to develop cut-points for waist- and ankle-worn accelerometers to differentiate non-ambulation from walking and different walking speeds in people post stroke. Forty-two post-stroke persons wore waist and ankle accelerometers (ActiGraph GT3x+, AG) while performi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One option is to use two monitors simultaneously to measure all domains of physical activity, which has been implemented in previous stroke studies. 19 22 Wearing a device on the ankle is known to improve the accuracy of measurements of step count for devices including the actigraph 23 and the Fitbit, 24 whereas wearing an activPAL device on the thigh provides accurate information regarding duration of time spent in postures (e.g. lying/sitting vs. standing).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One option is to use two monitors simultaneously to measure all domains of physical activity, which has been implemented in previous stroke studies. 19 22 Wearing a device on the ankle is known to improve the accuracy of measurements of step count for devices including the actigraph 23 and the Fitbit, 24 whereas wearing an activPAL device on the thigh provides accurate information regarding duration of time spent in postures (e.g. lying/sitting vs. standing).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%