2022
DOI: 10.1017/rdc.2022.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing an Absolute Chronological Framework for the Late Chalcolithic to Early Bronze Age in Iraqi Kurdistan: Radiocarbon Dates From Kani Shaie

Abstract: The possibility to conduct new fieldwork projects in previously largely unexplored Iraqi Kurdistan during the past decade has reinvigorated research into the transformative fifth to third millennium BCE (Chalcolithic to Early Bronze Age) in southwest Asia when human societies grew from small, autonomous villages to centralized states with urban centers. Major efforts to synchronize stratigraphic sequences from various sites in order to reach a consensus on archaeological periodization and to identify the absol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such sites are, in fact, Dalma-related, which usually contain a small amount of Dalma Impressed ware in their otherwise different ceramic assemblages. Following these requirements, none of the Mahidasht sites, such as Siahbid and Chogha Maran, with Red-Slipped and Dalma Impressed components belong to the Dalma period, because, first, they are lacking the characteristic Dalma Monochrome (Henrickson 1983;Renette et al 2021aRenette et al , 2022, and second, the quantities of these two Dalma ceramics in their ceramic assemblages are small, highly outnumbered by local ceramic types (e.g., Renette et al 2022:29, Figure 3). This is the case also for several sites in the east of the Tigris which either contain only small amount of Dalma Impressed, such as Kani Shaei, Phase VII and VIb (Renette et al 2021a), or contain a small amount of both Dalma Impressed and Dalma Monochrome, such as Surezha (Stein 2018:43;Stein and Fisher 2020:142).…”
Section: Dalma and Dalma-related Ceramic Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such sites are, in fact, Dalma-related, which usually contain a small amount of Dalma Impressed ware in their otherwise different ceramic assemblages. Following these requirements, none of the Mahidasht sites, such as Siahbid and Chogha Maran, with Red-Slipped and Dalma Impressed components belong to the Dalma period, because, first, they are lacking the characteristic Dalma Monochrome (Henrickson 1983;Renette et al 2021aRenette et al , 2022, and second, the quantities of these two Dalma ceramics in their ceramic assemblages are small, highly outnumbered by local ceramic types (e.g., Renette et al 2022:29, Figure 3). This is the case also for several sites in the east of the Tigris which either contain only small amount of Dalma Impressed, such as Kani Shaei, Phase VII and VIb (Renette et al 2021a), or contain a small amount of both Dalma Impressed and Dalma Monochrome, such as Surezha (Stein 2018:43;Stein and Fisher 2020:142).…”
Section: Dalma and Dalma-related Ceramic Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%