Establishing an Integrative Medicine Program Within an Academic Health Center: Essential Considerations

Abstract

“Integrative medicine” (IM) refers to the combination of conventional and “complementary” medical services (e.g. chiropractic, acupuncture, massage, mindfulness training). More than half of all medical schools in the United States and Canada have programs in IM and more than 30 academic health centers currently deliver multi-disciplinary IM care. What remains unclear, however, is the ideal delivery model (or models) whereby individuals can responsibly access IM care safely, effectively and reproducibly in a coordinated and cost-effective way. Current models of IM across existing clinical centers vary tremendously in their: 1) Organizational settings, principal clinical focus and services provided; 2) Practitioner team composition and training; 3) Incorporation of research activities and educational programs; and 4) Administrative organization, e.g. reporting structure, use of medical records, scope of clinical practice as well as financial strategies, i.e. specific business plans and models for sustainability. In this Perspective, the authors address these important strategic issues by sharing lessons learned from the design and implementation of an IM facility within an academic teaching hospital, i.e. the Brigham and Women's Hospital at Harvard Medical School; and, review alternative options considered based on information about IM centers across the United States. The authors conclude that there is currently no consensus as to how integrative care models should be optimally organized, implemented, replicated, assessed and funded. The time may be right for prospective research in “best practices” across emerging models of IM care nationally in an effort to standardize, refine and replicate them in preparation for rigorous cost-effectiveness evaluations.

Integrative Medicine in Interventional Oncology: A Virtuous Alliance

“…Stress management techniques are very low-risk interventions inducing a parasympathetic response [14,[26][27][28]. They are only contraindicated in patients with psychotic disorders.…”

Complementary Medicine Provision in an Academic Hospital: Evaluation and Structuring Project

“…Indeed, training qualifications were not subjected to structured control, unlike other integrative medicine projects, which assigned high importance to the training evaluation of practitioners. 23,32,33 Therefore, institutional standardization of training requirements should be required to ensure quality and safety of care. Thus, requirements of training for each CM would be specified by a working group of physicians, nurses, and human resources staff.…”

Informing the model of care for an academic integrative healthcare centre: a qualitative study exploring healthcare consumer perspectives

“…There is also growing interest in integrating non-biologically active TCIM services, such as massage/touch therapies, mind-body interventions and acupuncture, into secondary IHC settings [22][23][24]. However, unlike North America and Europe, there are no university-based academic IHC centres in Australia [25,26].…”