2012
DOI: 10.1128/aem.06691-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Equivalence for Microbial-Growth-Inhibitory Effects (“Iso-Hurdle Rules”) by Analyzing Disparate Listeria monocytogenes Data with a Gamma-Type Predictive Model

Abstract: Preservative factors act as hurdles against microorganisms by inhibiting their growth; these are essential control measures for particular food-borne pathogens. Different combinations of hurdles can be quantified and compared to each other in terms of their inhibitory effect ("iso-hurdle"). We present here a methodology for establishing microbial iso-hurdle rules in three steps: (i) developing a predictive model based on existing but disparate data sets, (ii) building an experimental design focused on the iso-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibitory effect of SCFAs on pathogen growth is described by the minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC) equation [ 29 , 30 ]: where [ L ] and [ A ] are the concentrations of nondissociated lactic and acetic acids, respectively, in mg·mL −1 ; MIC is the minimum inhibitory concentration in mg/mL; and α and β are constants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibitory effect of SCFAs on pathogen growth is described by the minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC) equation [ 29 , 30 ]: where [ L ] and [ A ] are the concentrations of nondissociated lactic and acetic acids, respectively, in mg·mL −1 ; MIC is the minimum inhibitory concentration in mg/mL; and α and β are constants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth was defined by an increase in CFU of more than 1 log 10 (Pujol et al, 2012), considering that it should be twice the commonly accepted microbiological experimental error of 0.5 log 10 CFU. In one of the conditions tested in our study, successive slight increases in counts, approx.…”
Section: Criteria To Define Growth Versus No Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were analyzed by applying simultaneously primary and secondary models. The model error was found to be 0.5 log cfu/mL, which is compatible with commonly accepted for microbiological experimental error (Pujol et al, 2012). The parameters of the model were shown to be significant (P b 0.05) (Table S1 in supplementary materials).…”
Section: Estimation Of E Coli Contamination Following Hhp: N Post-hpmentioning
confidence: 69%