2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing forensic food models for authentication and quantification of porcine adulterant in gelatine and marshmallow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these works, we used this less expensive method in our study, except that we detected the separated AAs with a diode array detector, which has been shown to authenticate skin gelatine sources. This method was validated and verified on marshmallows, with the results published by Sani et al (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on these works, we used this less expensive method in our study, except that we detected the separated AAs with a diode array detector, which has been shown to authenticate skin gelatine sources. This method was validated and verified on marshmallows, with the results published by Sani et al (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Since it is the most prevalent chemometrics classification technique, discriminant analysis (DA) is utilised extensively in food authentication. Sani et al (2021) also authenticated gelatine products using DA, whereas there are few reports of PLS-DA applications for authenticating gelatine sources. noted that PLS-DA characteristics such as Fisher statistics and p-value could serve as discriminatory indicators for authentication purposes.…”
Section: Halalsphere International Islamic University Malaysia -Inhartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another verification dataset with 93 data points and 20 replicates for each unknown soap sample ( n = 5) was used to validate regression models on cosmetic soap. Next, regression analysis utilizing MLR, PLS‐R and PCR was performed on the validation dataset [24]. The formula for MLR, PLS‐R and PCR that have been used are as below: MLR: ŷ = b 0 + b 1 x …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve relevant findings, pre-requisite MDA must be carried out [30], beginning with choosing the appropriate dataset for the study using the KMO test. For the 250 datasets, the KMO test produced a KMO score of 0.820 (Table 2).…”
Section: Validation and Verification Of The Da Model Between Oa And H...mentioning
confidence: 99%