2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-014-0205-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Mathematical Models to Predict Grain Size and Hardness of the Friction Stir-Welded AA 7020 Aluminum Alloy Joints

Abstract: In this study, response surface methodology in conjunction with a central composite design was applied to predict the grain size and hardness of friction stir-welded AA 7020 aluminum alloy joints. For this purpose, three welding parameters, including tool rotational speed, traverse speed, and tool axial force, at five levels and 20 runs were considered. In order to validate the predicted models, the analysis of variance was performed. Hardness and microstructural features of the joints were investigated using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Due to high complex and nonlinear characteristics of the process, the optimum value of FSP parameters cannot be easily obtained using just the mathematical models of FSP. 19…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Due to high complex and nonlinear characteristics of the process, the optimum value of FSP parameters cannot be easily obtained using just the mathematical models of FSP. 19…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friction stir welding (FSW) as a relatively new welding technique has been employed to weld different Al, 510 Mg, 11,12 and Cu 5,1316 alloys, some of which are classified as practically unweldable alloys in use of conventional welding methods. The FSP has been invented based on the FSW for local modification of different materials microstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the larger the grain size, the lower the hardness, according to the Zener–Hollomon equation. 28 , 29 Therefore, the larger the better should be used in terms of the microhardness results. Similarly, the rotational speed is the dominant factor affecting the microhardness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%