2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing obstetrics-specific metrics and interventions for antimicrobial stewardship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wong et al 22 found that non-protocolized interventions were Unsurprisingly, these combinations of antimicrobials were the most prescribed in our study, and 83% of our participants received appropriate empiric antibiotics. Ongoing monitoring for treatment failures allows for internal quality control of such protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wong et al 22 found that non-protocolized interventions were Unsurprisingly, these combinations of antimicrobials were the most prescribed in our study, and 83% of our participants received appropriate empiric antibiotics. Ongoing monitoring for treatment failures allows for internal quality control of such protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Wong et al 22 found that non‐protocolized interventions were 3.07 times more likely to be inappropriate compared with protocolized indications in obstetric patients. Hence, ongoing development of antimicrobial protocols is needed, including routine re‐evaluation of local microbial epidemiology and resistance patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%