2014
DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2014.986155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing smoke-free hospitals in Vietnam: A pilot project

Abstract: In Vietnam, a pilot 'smoke-free hospital' model was implemented in nine hospitals in 2009-2010 to supply lessons learned that would facilitate a replication of this model elsewhere. This study aimed to assess smoking patterns among health professionals and to detect levels of second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure within hospital premises before and after the 'smoke-free hospital' model implementation. A pre- and post-intervention cross-sectional study was conducted in nine purposively selected hospitals. Air nicoti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 This means that implementing a smoke-free environment at workplaces in Vietnam may be feasible. However, the current study indicates that adults are less likely to agree with "no smoking in public places" than at workplaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8 This means that implementing a smoke-free environment at workplaces in Vietnam may be feasible. However, the current study indicates that adults are less likely to agree with "no smoking in public places" than at workplaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In 2010, a study was conducted on secondhand smoke in Vietnam in different public places and found that the level of nicotine was much higher than the WHO standard, 11 whereas concentrated nicotine levels measured in hospitals was not. 8 It may not be easy in Vietnam to implement Decision No. 1315 in public places, unless Vietnam establishes a tobacco law with serious penalties for smoking in public places.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results for before-after studies were varying (P for homogeneity <0.01) and depended on the type of intervention: they were positive except for one of them, which showed tiny post intervention differences (Table 1). At risk of bias analysis, three studies reached a good score: Battle et al (1991) Dao Thi Minh et al (2015) performed a pre-and post-intervention cross-sectional study in nine selected hospitals after a ''smoke-free hospital model'' implementation: smoking prevalence significantly decreased post-intervention, but the number of daily cigarettes smoked at workplaces among male health workers remained unchanged. Moreover, air nicotine levels in the doctors' lounges and in emergency departments did not change post-intervention, while at other sites the levels decreased minimally.…”
Section: Results For Before-after Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An, Kibria, Huy, Hai, and Stillman (2014) conducted a study to assess the effectiveness of a ‘smoke-free hospital’ model and found that, after the intervention, smoking was more likely to take place outside of buildings and cafeterias. However, air nicotine levels in the doctors’ lounges and in emergency departments did not change post-intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%