Establishing sustainability indicators as an evolving process: experience from the island of Guernsey

Abstract

This paper uses the case of developing sustainability indicators on the Island of Guernsey over the last four years to show that Agenda 21's call to activate grass roots action is being realized, but in ways that are neither top down and modernist in approach, nor bottom up and post-modern as Agenda 21 advocates. Whilst best practice literature often suggests that community involvement must be engaged prior to designing sustainability indicators, this paper explores the reasons why this is not always possible. Guernsey's case is used to show how it only became possible to generate interest in the indicator process once the indicators were actually operational. It also shows that once interest was secured by a few relevant stakeholders it became possible to further evolve the indicators in a process that has slowly been attracting more and more of the island's community. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Determinant factors in the degree of implementation of Local Agenda 21 in the European Union

“…Moreover, other papers focus on the design of sustainable development indicators (Liu and Hills, 1998;McAlpine and Birnie, 2006), on the development of a sustainability assessment systems (Devuyst, 2000) or on specifi c objectives of Program 21 such as construction development (Hall and Parchase, 2006) and waste minimization programs (Phillips et al, 2003) etc.…”

Skeletons out of the closet: effectiveness of conceptual frameworks for communicating sustainable development indicators

“…A participatory approach has been suggested as one tool to activate people. However, as the evidence from the island of Guernsey shows, it may be possible to generate grass roots interest towards the indicator process only after the indicators are already operational (McAlpine and Bimie, 2006). The Finnish experience on large scale voluntary expert participation shows that experts can be keen on commenting, but often only after indicators are already selected and data gathered (Rosenström and Kyllönen, 2007).…”

Managing development in the hillsides of Trinidad and Tobago using geoinformatics

“…These circumstances have fuelled the need of the Government of Trinidad and Tobago to develop a comprehensive, transparent and impartial National Hillside Development Policy, as it is necessary to bring together experts and community members to develop indicators that measure progress towards sustainability (McAlpine, 2006). The Town and Country Planning Division, following this approach, established a technical working group (TWG) during 2004 to facilitate the development of a National Planning Policy for Hillside Development.…”