Establishing the accuracy of asteroseismic mass and radius estimates of giant stars

Abstract

Context. Eclipsing binary stars with an oscillating giant component allow accurate stellar parameters to be derived and asteroseismic methods to be tested and calibrated. To this aim, suitable systems need to be firstly identified and secondly measured precisely and accurately. KIC 4054905 is one such system, which has been identified, but with measurements of a relatively low precision and with some confusion regarding its parameters and evolutionary state. Aims. Our aim is to provide a detailed and precise characterisation of the system and to test asteroseismic scaling relations. Methods. Dynamical and asteroseismic parameters of KIC4054905 were determined from Kepler time-series photometry and multiepoch high-resolution spectra from FIES at the Nordic Optical Telescope. Results. KIC 4054905 was found to belong to the thick disk and consist of two lower red giant branch (RGB) components with nearly identical masses of 0.95M and an age of 9.9 ± 0.6 Gyr. The most evolved star with R 8.4R displays solar-like oscillations. These oscillations suggest that the star belongs to the RGB, supported also by the radius, which is significantly smaller than the red clump phase for this mass and metallicity. Masses and radii from corrected asteroseismic scaling relations can be brought into full agreement with the dynamical values if the RGB phase is assumed, but a best scaling method could not be identified. Conclusions. The dynamical masses and radii were measured with a precision better than 1.0%. We firmly establish the evolutionary nature of the system to be that of two early RGB stars with an age close to 10 Gyr, unlike previous findings. The metallicity and Galactic velocity suggest that the system belongs to the thick disk of the Milky Way. We investigate the agreement between dynamical and asteroseismic parameters for KIC 4054905 measured in various ways. This suggests that consistent solutions exist, but the need to analyse more of these systems continues in order to establish the accuracy of asteroseismic methods.

Does the νmax Scaling Relation Depend on Metallicity? Insights from 3D Convection Simulations

“…By applying this f Δν -corrected scaling relation, it was found that the radii align more closely with Gaia radii within 2% (Zinn et al 2019). Moreover, the masses now agree with dynamical masses within observational uncertainties (Brogaard et al 2018(Brogaard et al , 2022. On the other hand, based on the mixing-length theory of convection and results from nonadiabatic calculations of mode excitation and damping, Belkacem et al (2011Belkacem et al ( , 2013 suggested that the max n scaling relation should depend on Mach number near the stellar surface.…”

Asteroseismic Modeling of 1153 Kepler Red Giant Branch Stars: Improved Stellar Parameters with Gravity-mode Period Spacings and Luminosity Constraints

“…To test the accuracy of the scaling relations after applying corrections for various effects, we used a sample of five red giants in eclipsing binary systems, whose masses and radii are accurately measured by dynamical modeling. The five red giants are KIC 8410637 (Frandsen et al 2013), KIC 9970396, KIC 7037405, KIC 9540226 (Brogaard et al 2018, and KIC 4054905 (Brogaard et al 2022). They all have resolution spectra from APOGEE, allowing us to use the corrected scaling relations for APOGEE data.…”

Asteroseismic age estimate of the open cluster NGC 6866 using Kepler and Gaia

“…This method makes use of three equations representing the independent observations: The Stefan-Boltzmann equation for the luminosity and the two independent asteroseismic scaling relations for ρ and g A23, page 10 of 21 (e.g. Brogaard et al 2022, and references therein):…”