2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing the importance of human health risk assessment for metals and metalloids in urban environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the US EPA methodology is recommended by the Royal Decree 9/2005 for assessing risk at contaminated sites, it is very often applied in Spain (Nadal et al, 2007, Nadal et al, 2016Ordóñez et al, 2011Ordóñez et al, , 2013Peña-Fernández et al, 2014;Rovira et al, 2012Rovira et al, , 2015. There are also examples of its application in other European countries (Wcisło et al, 2002, Wcisło et al, 2005, Wcisło et al, 2012.…”
Section: Human Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the US EPA methodology is recommended by the Royal Decree 9/2005 for assessing risk at contaminated sites, it is very often applied in Spain (Nadal et al, 2007, Nadal et al, 2016Ordóñez et al, 2011Ordóñez et al, , 2013Peña-Fernández et al, 2014;Rovira et al, 2012Rovira et al, , 2015. There are also examples of its application in other European countries (Wcisło et al, 2002, Wcisło et al, 2005, Wcisło et al, 2012.…”
Section: Human Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It should be noted that although there are many examples of the US EPA risk assessment methodology application in Spain and worldwide, they do not address segregating non-carcinogens by primary target organs or systems and deriving target organ/system-specific hazard indices (Nadal et al, 2007, Nadal et al, 2016Ordóñez et al, 2011Ordóñez et al, , 2013Peña-Fernández et al, 2014;Rovira et al, 2012Rovira et al, , 2015Xu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Baseline Human Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…RfD is an estimate of daily exposure that will probably have no adverse effect on the human population (Smith 1996). SF relates exposure to the probability of having a carcinogenic effect (Peña-Fernández et al 2014). Both RfD and SF are expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day.…”
Section: Dose-response Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban environments are vital for human health and sustainable development, and globally, more than 50% of the world population now live in urban areas (Statista 2016;Peña-Fernández et al 2014). Urban rivers in rapidly developing regions are often severely impacted by uncontrolled population growth and lagging infrastructure development (Singh et al 2010;Enger et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%