2020
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2019.2907038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing the Input Impedance Requirements of ECG Recording Amplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 ). Therefore, in dry contact textile electrodes, lower impedance was not correlated to improvements in ECG signal performance, which is contrary to previous findings [ 7 , 28 , 29 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10 ). Therefore, in dry contact textile electrodes, lower impedance was not correlated to improvements in ECG signal performance, which is contrary to previous findings [ 7 , 28 , 29 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Electrode impedance has been considered as one of the main performance metrics in evaluating electrodes for recording high-quality biosignals [ 7 , 28 , 29 ]. We evaluated the impedance performance of dry textile electrodes with and without conductive materials (listed in Table 1 ) screen-printed on them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To obtain undistorted and high-quality ECG measurements, the magnitude of the skin-electrode impedance should be at least a factor 10 lower than the input impedance of the amplifier over a bandwidth of 0.05-150 Hz. [13][14][15] This is often the case, considering that the input impedance of modern amplifiers is 10 MΩ-1 TΩ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For typical electrode footprints, these levels can achieve an absolute impedance which is well below the minimum input impedance of ECG measurement equipment which is at least 10 MΩ. [13] Attenuation of the signals occurs when the skin-electrode impedance is significantly greater than the input impedance ( Figure S1, Supporting Information). Reduced values of the skin-electrode impedance can be a result of 1) hydration of the stratum corneum by sweat or gels and/or 2) physical compromise of the stratum corneum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%