Establishing the psychometric properties of a scale for evaluating quality in printed education materials

Bernier, Mary Jane

doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(96)00927-5

Cited by 36 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…• Content: a 3-item scale that captured participants' ratings on the quality, relevance and quantity of content, a reduced version of the Bernier Instructional Design Scale (Bernier 1996) …”

Section: Questionnairesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing the Role of Interactivity in User Experience

Sutcliffe

Hart

2016

International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An experimental investigation into the role of interaction in user experience (UX) with a controlled manipulation of interactivity features (e.g. avatars, interactive video) in a university information website is reported. The more interactive version had better affect and hedonic ratings, even though its perceived usability was worse. Analysis of qualitative data showed users were attracted to the interactive features, although they complained about poor usability. The results of the experiments are discussed to consider the role of interactivity in user experience and the differences between users' quantitative judgements of UX and their comments on interactive features which reveal different perspectives.

show abstract

Section: Questionnairesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing the Role of Interactivity in User Experience

Sutcliffe

Hart

2016

International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…En los últimos años la revisión bibliográfica y la investigación biomédica han demostrado un progresivo interés en la legibilidad de los folletos que se entregan a los pacientes [6][7][8] . Para mejorar la comunicación entre los agentes sanitarios y los pacientes se recomienda diseñar la información de acuerdo con las característi-cas de la población 9,10 .…”

Section: Methodsunclassified

Consenso sobre los criterios de legibilidad de los folletos de educación para la salud

Barrio¹,

Simón‐Lorda

Melguizo³

et al. 2011

Anales Sis San Navarra

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

resuMenFundamento. Identificación de los aspectos más relevantes que establecen las recomendaciones sobre la legibilidad folletos de educación para la salud.Material y métodos. Metodología Delphi con objeto de conseguir entre los expertos un consenso sobre los criterios de legibilidad en el diseño y la edición de folletos de educación para la salud.resultados. Diecisiete expertos llegaron a un acuerdo sobre las principales recomendaciones para asegurar la legibilidad de los folletos de educación para la salud. Son las siguientes: a) Sobre el contenido y el diseño del texto: estructurar el texto con títulos, subtítulos, explicación del mensaje y conclusión. b) Sobre la construcción del texto: utilizar frases simples y concisas, ofrecer esquemas y ejemplos, destacando gráficamente las ideas principales; c) Sobre la comprensión léxica: utilizar palabras sencillas y evitar el lenguaje técnico y abreviaturas. d) Sobre la tipografía: usar un tipo de fuente fácil de leer.conclusiones. Hay un alto grado de consenso con respecto a cómo deben ser elaborados los folletos de educación para la salud. La lista de recomendaciones podría ser utilizada como instrumento para revisar y mejorar el diseño de materiales de educación para la salud. En general, es necesario implicar a los destinatarios de los folletos a colaborar en la redacción y diseño de los mismos.Palabras clave. Legibilidad. Método Delphi. Educación para la salud. aBstractBackground. To identify the most relevant aspects that guarantee the readability, clarity and simplicity of written health education materials.

show abstract

“…3,16,17,23,26 Phase 3: Design of the Instrument Based on the previously established domains and their respective items, a tool for the evaluation of PEM was developed. Each item was presented in the form of an affirmation, followed by an assessment scale with 3 categories: totally disagree, corresponding to 0 points; partially agree, corresponding to 1 point; totally agree, corresponding to 2 points.…”

Section: Development Of the Evaluation Toolmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This scale was adapted from the scale proposed in The Bernier Instructional Design Scale (BIDS). 3 After the scoring scale, there was a blank space for comments. In the instructions, the evaluators were asked to report any problems faced in this field while setting up the PEM or to state "not applicable" when appropriate.…”

Section: Development Of the Evaluation Toolmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Different authors have established the most important steps in developing PEM [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] for literate patients. Some articles in the current literature have reported the poor quality of information of such materials [11][12][13][14][15][16] , as well as the lack of scientific accuracy to promote the education of patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development and validity of a method for the evaluation of printed education material

Castro¹,

Pilger²,

Fuchs³

et al. 2007

Pharmacy pract. (Granada Ed. impr.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

*Objectives: To develop and study the validity of an instrument for evaluation of Printed Education Materials (PEM); to evaluate the use of acceptability indices; to identify possible influences of professional aspects. Methods: An instrument for PEM evaluation was developed which included tree steps: domain identification, item generation and instrument design. A reading to easy PEM was developed for education of patient with systemic hypertension and its treatment with hydrochlorothiazide. Construct validity was measured based on previously established errors purposively introduced into the PEM, which served as extreme groups. An acceptability index was applied taking into account the rate of professionals who should approve each item. Participants were 10 physicians (9 men) and 5 nurses (all women). Results: Many professionals identified intentional errors of crude character. Few participants identified errors that needed more careful evaluation, and no one detected the intentional error that required literature analysis. Physicians considered as acceptable 95.8% of the items of the PEM, and nurses 29.2%. The differences between the scoring were statistically significant in 27% of the items. In the overall evaluation, 66.6% were considered as acceptable. The analysis of each item revealed a behavioral pattern for each professional group. Conclusions: The use of instruments for evaluation of printed education materials is required and may improve the quality of the PEM available for the patients. Not always are the acceptability indices totally correct or represent high quality of information. The professional experience, the practice pattern, and perhaps the gendre of the reviewers may influence their evaluation. RESUMENObjetivos: Desarrollar y estudiar la validez de un instrumento para la evaluación del material educativo impreso (MEI); evaluar el uso de los índices de aceptabilidad; identificar las posibles influencias de los aspectos profesionales. Métodos: Se desarrolló un instrumento para evaluación del MEI en tres pasos: identificación de dominios, generación de ítems y diseño del instrumento. Se desarrolló un MEI fácil de leer para la educación de pacientes con hipertensión sistémica y su tratamiento con hidroclorotiazida. Se midió la validez del instrumento mediante los errores previamente introducidos a propósito en el MEI, lo que sirvió de grupo extremo. Se aplicó un índice de aceptabilidad teniendo en cuenta la tasa de profesionales que tenía que aprobar cada ítem. Participaron 10 médicos (9 hombres) y 5 enfermeras (todas mujeres). Resultados: Muchos profesionales identificaron los errores intencionales de carácter crudo. Pocos participantes identificaron los errores que necesitaban una evaluación más cuidadosa, y ninguno identificó el error intencional que requería análisis de la literatura. Los médicos consideraron aceptable el 95,8% de los ítems del MEI y las enfermeras el 29,2%. Las diferencias de puntuación fueron estadísticamente significativas en el 27% de los ítems. En la evaluaci...

show abstract

Establishing the psychometric properties of a scale for evaluating quality in printed education materials

Cited by 36 publications

References 34 publications

Analyzing the Role of Interactivity in User Experience

Analyzing the Role of Interactivity in User Experience

Consenso sobre los criterios de legibilidad de los folletos de educación para la salud

Development and validity of a method for the evaluation of printed education material

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About