2010
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Zebrafish as a Novel Exercise Model: Swimming Economy, Swimming-Enhanced Growth and Muscle Growth Marker Gene Expression

Abstract: BackgroundZebrafish has been largely accepted as a vertebrate multidisciplinary model but its usefulness as a model for exercise physiology has been hampered by the scarce knowledge on its swimming economy, optimal swimming speeds and cost of transport. Therefore, we have performed individual and group-wise swimming experiments to quantify swimming economy and to demonstrate the exercise effects on growth in adult zebrafish.Methodology/Principal FindingsIndividual zebrafish (n = 10) were able to swim at a crit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
134
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
16
134
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2A), as predicted by various models derived exclusively from hydrodynamic theory (Pettersson and Hedenström, 2000;Wakeman and Wohlschlag, 1981). This finding is highly consistent with empirical observations made in other fish species including European sea bass (Claireaux et al, 2006), Atlantic cod (Syme et al, 2008), Pacific bonito (Sepulveda et al, 2003), several flatfish (Duthie, 1982) and zebrafish (Palstra et al, 2010). Here, optimal swimming speed (U opt =speed with minimal cost of transport) was 2.1 BL s −1 for TCOT ( Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Catheters and Blood Sampling On Swimming Performancesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2A), as predicted by various models derived exclusively from hydrodynamic theory (Pettersson and Hedenström, 2000;Wakeman and Wohlschlag, 1981). This finding is highly consistent with empirical observations made in other fish species including European sea bass (Claireaux et al, 2006), Atlantic cod (Syme et al, 2008), Pacific bonito (Sepulveda et al, 2003), several flatfish (Duthie, 1982) and zebrafish (Palstra et al, 2010). Here, optimal swimming speed (U opt =speed with minimal cost of transport) was 2.1 BL s −1 for TCOT ( Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Catheters and Blood Sampling On Swimming Performancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This interesting difference has been commonly reported in the fish literature. It indicates that maximal aerobic efficiency (Webb, 1971) is achieved at ~70% U crit , whereas maximal muscle efficiency occurs at ~30-40% U crit (Luna-Acosta et al, 2011;Palstra et al, 2008;Palstra et al, 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Catheters and Blood Sampling On Swimming Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developmental differences have led to fuel use and biochemical differences between these tissue types. Red muscle exists as a wedge running along the lateral line in most species and is recruited for steady-state swimming (up to 70%Y80% of critical swimming speed (U crit )) because of its high mitochondrial content (as indexed by citrate synthase (CS) (31)) and enhanced ability to take up and oxidize fatty acids probably because of higher carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT-I) activities per unit mitochondria (25,35). The larger white muscle mass makes up the bulk of the animal's trunk and is heavily recruited for burst exercise.…”
Section: Advantage Of Using Fish As a Model Of Muscle Remodeling And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximal speeds may be important ecologically under certain circumstances, such as when defending territories or escaping predators . However, animals under undisturbed conditions often do not move at their maximal capacity (Hasler et al, 2009;Husak, 2006;McDonald et al, 2007;Irschick and Losos, 1998;Irschick et al, 2005;Palstra et al, 2010;Wickler et al, 2000). Our data showing that voluntary speed changes linearly with maximal speed is interesting because it suggests that there is a mechanistic link between the two.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%