2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment and application of a multiplex PCR for rapid and simultaneous detection of six viruses in swine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is analogous to those of previous studies, which found that some RNA viruses, such as hepatitis A virus, bovine viral diarrhea virus, SARS-coronavirus, Newcastle disease virus, Marburg virus, and swine fever virus, also show a weak codon usage bias [22, 3438]. A possible explanation for this is that the low codon usage bias may be beneficial for the efficient transcription and translation of virus genes in host cells [22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This result is analogous to those of previous studies, which found that some RNA viruses, such as hepatitis A virus, bovine viral diarrhea virus, SARS-coronavirus, Newcastle disease virus, Marburg virus, and swine fever virus, also show a weak codon usage bias [22, 3438]. A possible explanation for this is that the low codon usage bias may be beneficial for the efficient transcription and translation of virus genes in host cells [22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…PCV2 infections by themselves generally cause only mild disease; however, their frequent association with co‐infections with other porcine viruses, such as classical swine fever virus (CSFV), porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus (PRRSV) and porcine parvovirus (PPV), can result in damage to the porcine immune system and more serious disease (Chen et al., ; Zeng et al., ). A study of simultaneous infection of pigs with CSFV and PCV2 showed a higher PCV2 load in organs and substantially different pathologic lesions as compared to infection with PCV2 only (Jacobsen et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods for CSFV detection relied on virus isolation or serological diagnosis. Recently, several molecular assays have been developed to detect CSFV and replace classical assays and are in wide use252627. However, few of these methods could discriminate between wild-type CSFV strains and vaccine strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%