1997
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2400838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment and characterization of a new erythropoietin-dependent acute myeloid leukemia cell line, AS-E2

Abstract: We have established an erythropoietin-dependent human leuonly human leukemic cell line that is exclusively EPO depenkemia cell line, AS-E2, from a patient with acute myeloid leukedent. Because of its late erythroid cell characteristics and its mia. These cells have many characteristics of late erythroid strict EPO dependency, we think that AS-E2 is a good model progenitor cells, they are positive for CD36, Glycophorin A, and to study the effect of EPO on erythroid cell growth and signal (ASD-chE), but some of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as the pharmacodynamic component of biological activity is concerned, in vitro alternatives to the pharmacopoeial in vivo assays can be employed. For example, measuring proliferation of an erythropoietin-dependent cell line instead of using the normocythaemic assay in mice to compare biological activity of erythropoietin; 8 or using homologous (e.g., granulosa cells or Sertoli cells) or heterologous (transfected cell lines expressing the target receptor) assay systems instead of using the Steelman-Pohley assay to compare biological activity of a human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). 9 Homologous systems have the advantage of being similar to the natural environment, but the disadvantages are the need to harvest cells from animals with a limited yield, the intrinsic variability and the nonhuman nature of the cells.…”
Section: Pharmacopoeial In Vivo Bioassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the pharmacodynamic component of biological activity is concerned, in vitro alternatives to the pharmacopoeial in vivo assays can be employed. For example, measuring proliferation of an erythropoietin-dependent cell line instead of using the normocythaemic assay in mice to compare biological activity of erythropoietin; 8 or using homologous (e.g., granulosa cells or Sertoli cells) or heterologous (transfected cell lines expressing the target receptor) assay systems instead of using the Steelman-Pohley assay to compare biological activity of a human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). 9 Homologous systems have the advantage of being similar to the natural environment, but the disadvantages are the need to harvest cells from animals with a limited yield, the intrinsic variability and the nonhuman nature of the cells.…”
Section: Pharmacopoeial In Vivo Bioassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of EPO AS-E2 cells die by apoptosis. 30 We questioned whether catalytically active or inactive SHIP might affect the survival of EPO deprived AS-E2 cells. As shown in Figure 2c, both wtSHIP and SHIP D672A overexpressing cells died significantly faster than control cells.…”
Section: H-thymidine Was Added To Exponential Growing Cells For 6 H Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AS-E2 cells were generously provided by Tomonaga 30 and grown in IMDM supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated FBS and 2 U/ml EPO (0.5-1.0 × 10 6 cells/ml if not otherwise stated). For transfected cells this medium was supplemented with 450 g/ml Geneticin (G418).…”
Section: Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent investigations of rhEPO activity estimates have been carried out using cell culture assays based on different cell lines, including AS-E2, TF1, UT-7 and UT-7/EPO (20)(21)(22)(23). However, these in vitro assays have a serious disadvantage since they are unable to discriminate between intact EPO and its asialo-or aglycosylated variants, which have a much shorter half-life and, therefore, a greatly reduced bioactivity when administered in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%