1996
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.1996.34.10.829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment and Evaluation of a New Chemiluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay for Carcinoembryonic Antigen Adapted to the Fully Automated ACCESS®System

Abstract: We have established a new chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), designated ACCESS CEA, which is adapted to the fully automated ACCESS® immunoassay analyzer. The assay is based on a one step sandwich-type method using two monoclonal antibodies, one of which is immobilized on micrometer-size paramagnetic particles and the other is conjugated to alkaline phosphatase. Ten microliters of calibrators or sera are incubated for 5 minutes at 37 °C with the particles and with the alkali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be due to the fact that these two immunoassay analyzers use a single monoclonal antibody for two-step sandwich immunoassay, while the other two assays use one or more different antibodies. Several comparative studies of CEA assays have been reported [ 12 15 18 19 20 ]. In one of these studies, CEA data obtained by Unicel DxI800 showed the highest degree of correlation with those measured by ADVIA Centaur XP [slope (95% CI), 0.910 (0.883 to 0.947); intercept (95% CI), −0.240 (−0.362 to −0.171)] [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be due to the fact that these two immunoassay analyzers use a single monoclonal antibody for two-step sandwich immunoassay, while the other two assays use one or more different antibodies. Several comparative studies of CEA assays have been reported [ 12 15 18 19 20 ]. In one of these studies, CEA data obtained by Unicel DxI800 showed the highest degree of correlation with those measured by ADVIA Centaur XP [slope (95% CI), 0.910 (0.883 to 0.947); intercept (95% CI), −0.240 (−0.362 to −0.171)] [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to choose an appropriate curve-fitting model for calibration curves and to consider all calibration curve-related factors, including quality and stability of reference standards, quality and stability of reagents, and statistical validity of the calibration curve [ 10 11 ]. Although various CEA assays with different principles, including chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), enzyme immunoassay, radioimmunoassay, fluorescence immunoassay, and lateral flow immunoassay have been introduced, currently, automated CLIA analyzers with high sensitivity and high throughput are the most widely used [ 12 13 14 ]. Despite ongoing standardization efforts, CEA concentrations from different manufacturers can vary owing to the lack of accurate calibration as well as differences in assay principle, the epitope used, antibody specificities, and the reagents used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,14 We firstly tried to detect human CEA without using a second antibody. Human CEA was subjected to the CEA monoclonal antibody-immobilized gold surface (Fig.…”
Section: Detection Of Cea By Using Ft-ir Rasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 However, it is also known that CEA often gives a high rate of false positive signals. 11 When the FT-IR RAS measurement can be applied to this assay system, it should give a reduced rate of false positive signals because of its structural information. The concept of the immobilization of a CEA monoclonal antibody on a gold surface and its interaction assay with CEA are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On-time, sensitive, and repeatable detection of CEA are crucial for the early diagnosis and treatment of those diseases. Classical labeled immunosensors techniques, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 4,14 radioimmunoassay (RIA), 15 and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA), [16][17][18] are time consuming and require expensive optical equipment for characterization. Label-free and real-time detection is required by clinical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%