2021
DOI: 10.1111/cas.14754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment and implementation of Cancer Genomic Medicine in Japan

Abstract: Approximately 1 in 2 Japanese people are estimated to be diagnosed with cancer during their lifetime. Cancer still remains the leading cause of death in Japan, therefore the government of Japan has decided to develop a better cancer control policy and launched the Cancer Genomic Medicine (CGM) program. The Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (MHLW) held a consortium at their headquarters with leading academic authorities and the representatives of related organizations to discuss ways to advance CGM in Jap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High-income countries such as Australia offer universal health care and strongly funded research [ 57 ], high levels of public trust in health care governance and longstanding policies on personalized or precision medicine, leading to wide take-up of genomics, biomarkers, smart data generation and analytics, all bolstered by substantial national dialogue at the academic, industry and public levels. Japan, too, has established centralized databases (and reimbursement) for clinical and genomic tests, and outcome data that provide active feedback on treatment options [ 58 ], and the system is characterized by strong leadership and collaboration among academia, industry, government, and patients, with secure data transfer, strong links to hospitals, and good provision of education for health care workers, politicians, patients, and society, so personalized medicine in cancer is rapidly progressing. In Korea, national health insurance covers more than 70% of medical costs and provides NGS tests for cancer and rare genetic disorders [ 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-income countries such as Australia offer universal health care and strongly funded research [ 57 ], high levels of public trust in health care governance and longstanding policies on personalized or precision medicine, leading to wide take-up of genomics, biomarkers, smart data generation and analytics, all bolstered by substantial national dialogue at the academic, industry and public levels. Japan, too, has established centralized databases (and reimbursement) for clinical and genomic tests, and outcome data that provide active feedback on treatment options [ 58 ], and the system is characterized by strong leadership and collaboration among academia, industry, government, and patients, with secure data transfer, strong links to hospitals, and good provision of education for health care workers, politicians, patients, and society, so personalized medicine in cancer is rapidly progressing. In Korea, national health insurance covers more than 70% of medical costs and provides NGS tests for cancer and rare genetic disorders [ 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expert panel consisted of an oncologist for each organ, a clinical geneticist, a genetic counselor, a pathologist, a clinical trial coordinator, and a pharmacist. For detected alterations, oncogenicity was annotated based on the reports of each gene panel and Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) guidelines, 18 and treatment for oncogenic mutations was recommended based on the results of clinical trials mainly in Japan and the recommendation level (A to F) in C-CAT. 3,8 The possibility of drug treatment through the patient offer system was also proposed.…”
Section: Expert Panel For Cgp Panelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access—As databases such as disease registries are established in Japan [ 17 , 91 , 92 ], more biomarker, multi-omics data as well as electronic health data will accumulate. The content of these databases should be poised to be shared openly and efficiently, such that the curated data can be leveraged to its maximum.…”
Section: Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 99%