2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-021-00608-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of a quantitative RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus

Abstract: Background The outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a public health emergency of international concern. Quantitative testing of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) virus is demanded in evaluating the efficacy of antiviral drugs and vaccines and RT-PCR can be widely deployed in the clinical assay of viral loads. Here, we developed a quantitative RT-PCR method for SARS-CoV-2 virus detection in this study. Methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous experiments done in our laboratory using the NEB’s WarmStart Colorimetric LAMP 2X Master Mix with primers targeting genes N and E of SARS-CoV-2 could not achieve a limit of detection below 50 copies per μL (data not shown). The limit of detection of RT-PCR tests using purified samples varies between 0.08 19 and 14 20 copies per μL 21 23 . Comparing our LoD with other molecular tests using a direct swab, our limit of detection was 25,000 copies per mL when the LoD of the commercial tests were 60,000–540,000 NDU per mL 24 —viral RNA copies/mL is equivalent to genome copy equivalents/mL (GCE/mL) or nucleic acid detectable units/mL (NDU/mL) 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous experiments done in our laboratory using the NEB’s WarmStart Colorimetric LAMP 2X Master Mix with primers targeting genes N and E of SARS-CoV-2 could not achieve a limit of detection below 50 copies per μL (data not shown). The limit of detection of RT-PCR tests using purified samples varies between 0.08 19 and 14 20 copies per μL 21 23 . Comparing our LoD with other molecular tests using a direct swab, our limit of detection was 25,000 copies per mL when the LoD of the commercial tests were 60,000–540,000 NDU per mL 24 —viral RNA copies/mL is equivalent to genome copy equivalents/mL (GCE/mL) or nucleic acid detectable units/mL (NDU/mL) 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (rtPCR) test was performed in the case of infection either locally or in public clinics using the FDA-approved TaqPath Combo Kit targeting the N2, ORF1Ab, and S genes [12]. Infection was then con rmed by a quantitative test of Anti-N-IgG to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein using Elecsys® immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions.…”
Section: Serological Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three genes, including E and N genes of SARS-CoV-2, and the human RNAse gene, were detected using the Quant Studio Real-Time PCR system (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the SOLIScript 1-step multiplex probe kit (ROX) (SOLIS BIODYNE, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Identification of the E-genewas done for screening, and detection of the N-gene confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, while human RNAse was used as control [23]. A cycle threshold value less than 37 was documented as a positive result, and 38 and more was documented as a negative result.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%