2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/8315641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of an Aggregation Model Associated with Instrument Interface Design Based on Kansei Factors of Electric Vehicle Drivers

Abstract: In traditional Miryoku engineering, the construction of product Kansei factors is only based on the qualitative analysis method. The traditional Miryoku engineering cannot effectively reflect the complex and changeable Kansei factors of users. Therefore, the research path of the Kansei factors needs to be expanded. In this paper, we proposed an evaluation-fuzzy-quantification model based on users’ Kansei, and the evaluation analysis, the fuzzy computing, and the quantitative analysis were combined to quantify … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the use of questionnaire surveys and in-depth interviews with relevant experts, the authors collected the current society's requirements for disinfection and epidemic prevention robots and then selected, decomposed, combined, and built the requirement level model [20]. In contrast with the traditional AHP analytic hierarchy process, by adopting the fuzzy AHP method, one can optimize the complicated consistency test and maintain the primacy of data [21,22]. The fuzzy AHP tool has better accuracy and objectivity in complex evaluation systems to calculate the demand weights of disinfection and epidemic prevention robots in all aspects.…”
Section: Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the use of questionnaire surveys and in-depth interviews with relevant experts, the authors collected the current society's requirements for disinfection and epidemic prevention robots and then selected, decomposed, combined, and built the requirement level model [20]. In contrast with the traditional AHP analytic hierarchy process, by adopting the fuzzy AHP method, one can optimize the complicated consistency test and maintain the primacy of data [21,22]. The fuzzy AHP tool has better accuracy and objectivity in complex evaluation systems to calculate the demand weights of disinfection and epidemic prevention robots in all aspects.…”
Section: Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expert interview Kansei evaluation Function evaluation Filter product design elements Synthesis is paper EGM GRA NN Wu and Cheng [16] EGM Fuzzy Kano, fuzzy AHP QT-I Wu and Kang [23] EGM Fuzzy AHP Kang et al [5] EGM Fuzzy Kano, fuzzy AHP Fuzzy QFD Kang et al [8] EGM QT-I Kang et al [24] Focus group Fuzzy Delphi FWARM Chen and Li [10] EGM QT-I Shen [13] EGM QT-I Zhang et al [15] EGM ANP Wang and Hsueh [25] AHP, Kano model DEMATEL Wang [26] AHP, TRIZ QFD Wang [27] Focus group TRIZ, FCPR RST Notes. FWARM: fuzzy weighted association rule mining; TRIZ: theory of inventive problem solving; DEMATEL: decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory; RST: rough set theory; FCPR: fuzzy cognitive pairwise rating.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users, designers, and products can be organically combined using the KE method, thus boosting user satisfaction and design efficiency. Wu et al [29] and Xue et al [30] proposed a comprehensive decision system for design. The importance of each design element in the system can be quantified based on the user's perceptions, combined with evaluation and analysis methods, such as fuzzy computing and quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%