2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of kinetic parameters of particle reaction from a well-stirred fluidized bed reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, when the flue gas flows to the gas analyzer, the mixing of gas species could affect the original signal and cause errors. Many researchers have focused on this problem for years and concluded that the deconvolution of the gas concentration data may help [40,42]. However, in some cases, the deconvolution method could still fail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, when the flue gas flows to the gas analyzer, the mixing of gas species could affect the original signal and cause errors. Many researchers have focused on this problem for years and concluded that the deconvolution of the gas concentration data may help [40,42]. However, in some cases, the deconvolution method could still fail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via a FB reactor with the inner diameter of 22 mm and an overall length of 870 mm, Schwebela et al 20 conducted the chemical looping combustion experiments and finally obtained the apparent kinetic parameters by fitting to different model approaches. To measure the kinetic parameters of the particle reaction in gasification, a self-made FB reaction analyzer, with a diameter of 34 mm and a typical fluidized height fluctuating around 70 mm, was established by Haustein et al 21 The gasification behavior in this FB reactor was examined and further compared to the TGA method. After reviewing this literature, we can see that, as a result of the lack of systematical research in hydrodynamics, the structure and parameter of the FB reactor adopted were diverse, making an obvious difference in reaction behavior even for the same reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other reactors, including mesh reactor, drop-tube furnace, FB, etc., have also been used to measure the gas–solid reaction behavior and calculate kinetic parameters, but for these analyzers, there are no standardized analytical approaches and customized instruments, which still suffer from the limitations of an uneven temperature distribution in the reactor, serious gas back mixing, and diffusion. Consequently, the kinetic data reported in the literature were always much different, even for the same feedstock and under nearly approximate experimental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bews et al first determined the kinetic parameters and reaction mechanism of the combustion of graphite using a small FBR (Bews et al, 2001). Subsequently, Fennell et al (2009) further developed this method to study the kinetics of burning of coal char in a FBR with a fast-response gas analyser of CO/CO2 (Álvarez et al, 2011;Haustein et al, 2015). More recently, Haustein et al also used a small-scale FBR with Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to study the kinetic parameters of char combustion and gasification (Haustein et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the existing kinetic studies of coal char combustion for FBR, there is a dearth of literature regarding air and oxy-fuel combustion of biomass when employing a FBR. Much of the previous work has focused on the kinetically-controlled oxidation reaction of char in different oxidising gases (Fennell et al, 2009;Gövert et al, 2017;Haustein et al, 2015;Morin et al, 2018). The apparent kinetics of air and oxy-fuel combustion of raw biomass by the FBR method and the effects of devolatilisation and volatile matter combustion on the kinetics measurement of char have not been well investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%