Multicellular tumor spheroids have been increasingly used by researchers to produce more physiologically relevant experimental environments. However, tracking of spheroid growth and treatment-induced volume reduction has not been readily adopted. Here, squamous carcinoma cells were seeded at different starting cell numbers with growth and reduction kinetics monitored using live cell imaging. Following the initial growth phase, spheroids were treated with auristatin as small molecule (MMAE) or as antibody-drug conjugate containing non-cleavable auristatin drug payload (033-F). Compared to cells in monolayers, 033-F had notably weaker potency against spheroids despite potency levels of MMAE being similar against monolayers and spheroids. Accumulation of released payload from 033-F was reduced in higher volume spheroids, likely contributing to the potency differences. Despite lowered potency towards spheroids with 033-F, spheroid volume was still readily reduced by 033-F in a dose-dependent fashion, with >85% volume reductions at the highest concentrations for all spheroid sizes. Additionally, the core of the larger spheroids showed more resiliency towards microtubule inhibition. Overall, this work highlights how various in-vivo 'features' such as tumor penetration, cell interactions, and increased resistance to therapeutics can be integrated into a spheroid model and tracked over time by automated imaging technology. In their native space, tumor cells experience interactions with neighboring cells over their entire surface area. This environment is vastly different than the conditions used for in vitro studies where cells attach to plastic dishes and grow in two-dimensions (2D) as monolayers. While many crucial molecular and cellular biology phenomena have been elucidated using cells cultivated on 2D surfaces, cell-to-cell communications, spatial orientation in the tissue, cell interactions with the surrounding matrix, and physiological signaling cannot be properly recreated 1. Growing cells into three-dimensional (3D) spheroids can better capture aspects of tumor biology such as regions of high oxygen, nutrients, and subsequently proliferation, as well as regions of low nutrients and hypoxia that can lead to cell quiescence and ultimately necrosis 2. A wide number of options for generating 3D spheroids has been put forth in the literature, including hanging drop, matrix-based methods, spinner flasks, and ultra-low adhesion plates, with each having its particular advantages and disadvantages 3. Due to approval rates under 10% for new therapeutics in oncology, improved methods of screening are needed to find better drugs to bring into clinical studies 4. More predictive models of drug efficacy and toxicity would help filter out candidates with a low chance of clinical success. Currently, many of the early-stage drug screens are performed with traditional 2D monolayers. Preclinical validation experiments typically lack many characteristics of the natural tumor milieu, instead presenting an environment that can be a s...