2017
DOI: 10.1089/chi.2016.0060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of the Pediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry: A National Research Collaborative for Identifying the Optimal Assessment and Treatment of Pediatric Obesity

Abstract: POWER is an established national registry representing a diverse sample of youth with obesity participating in multicomponent PWM programs across the United States. Using high-quality data collection and a collaborative research infrastructure, POWER aims to contribute to the development of evidence-based guidelines for multicomponent PWM programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This project was based on data from the Pediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry (POWER) (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02121132), a prospective study collecting longitudinal data from a network of 31 multicomponent PWM programs across the United States. The purpose of POWER is to identify participant and program characteristics associated with favorable outcomes . For inclusion in POWER, programs must provide multicomponent PWM treatment for youth with obesity and collect the required data elements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This project was based on data from the Pediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry (POWER) (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02121132), a prospective study collecting longitudinal data from a network of 31 multicomponent PWM programs across the United States. The purpose of POWER is to identify participant and program characteristics associated with favorable outcomes . For inclusion in POWER, programs must provide multicomponent PWM treatment for youth with obesity and collect the required data elements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many HCMS and some clinicians highlighted the need to embed research into clinical practice in order to inform best-practice models of care and to enable the development of a business case for new and/or expansion of services. Clinical groups in Europe [46], Canada [47] and the USA [48] have developed central registries to record and analyse standard clinical outcome data from multiple sites in each country. These central registries are a way to produce high-quality and meaningful outcome data, which can be used to identify best practices for pediatric weight management and as a way of undertaking multi-site research [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical groups in Europe [46], Canada [47] and the USA [48] have developed central registries to record and analyse standard clinical outcome data from multiple sites in each country. These central registries are a way to produce high-quality and meaningful outcome data, which can be used to identify best practices for pediatric weight management and as a way of undertaking multi-site research [48]. These collaborations are thought to be an essential component of weight management and should be a focus for all pediatric weight management services in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventy‐two percent of those seeking care from pediatric weight management programs have severe obesity 9 ; however, their response to lifestyle/behavioral management is modest, 10 with even lower responses associated with severity of obesity and adolescent age 10 , 11 . Few studies report the effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions for children with severe obesity, which range from 5% to 20% excessive body weight loss or a BMI reduction of 1.9–3 kg/m 2 10 , 12 , 13 .…”
Section: Rationale For Treatment Of Childhood Obesitymentioning
confidence: 99%