2017
DOI: 10.5301/jbm.5000232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of Two Data Mining Models of Lung Cancer Screening Based on Three Gene Promoter Methylations Combined with Telomere Damage

Abstract: The SVM and DT models for diagnosing lung cancer were successfully developed through the combined detection of p16, RASSF1A and FHIT promoter methylation and RTL, which provided useful tools for screening lung cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DTs are tree-structured schemes where the nodes represent the input variables, and the leaves correspond to decision outcomes [26]. They are widely used for classification purposes and can be intuitive [3]. ANNs are developed on the basis of biological neurons of the human brain and trained to generate an output outcome as a weighted combination of AGING the input variables [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DTs are tree-structured schemes where the nodes represent the input variables, and the leaves correspond to decision outcomes [26]. They are widely used for classification purposes and can be intuitive [3]. ANNs are developed on the basis of biological neurons of the human brain and trained to generate an output outcome as a weighted combination of AGING the input variables [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, chemical diagnosis, imaging diagnosis, cell and histocytological diagnosis are the primary diagnostic methods of lung cancer [3]. Among them, computed tomography (CT)-based imaging diagnosis is the AGING primary tool to detect lung cancer at early stages [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy for three model validation sets was 84.15%, 75.61%, and 80.49%, respectively. The combined Fisher model showed good ability to detect lung cancer, which is superior to the lung cancer diagnosis Fisher model (0.670, 95%CI 0.569-0.761) established with FHIT, RASSF1A, p16 promoter methylation, and relative telomere length in our prophase research [20] . This may be due to the miRNAs biomarkers has better specificity compared with gene or other biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…SVM model were established for lung cancer diagnostic in our study, which combined 10 miRNAs and 6 symptoms, had a higher accuracy. The combined SVM model with miRNAs was superior in lung cancer diagnosis in this study compared to models with methylation and telomere biomarkers in our prophase research [20] . The accuracy and AUC of combined SVM model in our study were also better than the results of other studies on gene and other biomarkers using ANN or SVM and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation