2012
DOI: 10.17230/ecos.2012.35.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estado y economía: Críticas y propuestas en las miradas de William Beveridge y Walter Eucken (Una perspectiva histórica comparada)

Abstract: El tema central que aquí se aborda es el desarrollo del pensamiento político-económico, tanto en Alemania como Gran Bretaña, relacionado con la construcción de sociedades en las que el Estado desempeña el papel de asegurar niveles de estabilidad y seguridad económica a sus habitantes, particularmente durante la década de 1940. Este artículo ofrece una perspectiva histórica comparada del pensamiento económico-político de William Beveridge y Walter Eucken. Los aspectos que se comparan son principalmente las crít… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sphere, and not in the market via prices and competition, there is a coordinated effort to try to adjust needs to available resources, defining the tasks, duties, and obligations of each economic entity [27]. The main criticism of this model focuses on bureaucratic rigidity and the excessive control of economic activities, which encourages corruption and the inefficiency of supply systems, drastically reducing dynamism, innovation, and risk incentives, which are so salutary in market economies [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sphere, and not in the market via prices and competition, there is a coordinated effort to try to adjust needs to available resources, defining the tasks, duties, and obligations of each economic entity [27]. The main criticism of this model focuses on bureaucratic rigidity and the excessive control of economic activities, which encourages corruption and the inefficiency of supply systems, drastically reducing dynamism, innovation, and risk incentives, which are so salutary in market economies [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%