2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6519(04)78512-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estapedectomía como cirugía ambulatoria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). After selection based on title and abstract, and subsequent full-text screening, 35 articles discussing 34 studies were considered eligible for further review (2–5,11–41). Cross-reference checking revealed no additional relevant articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1). After selection based on title and abstract, and subsequent full-text screening, 35 articles discussing 34 studies were considered eligible for further review (2–5,11–41). Cross-reference checking revealed no additional relevant articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of their reported methods showed that risk of bias was moderate to high in all 34 studies (2–5,11–41) resulting in a low level of evidence using the GRADE approach (42). Since none of the studies carried a low risk of bias, all 34 studies were included for further analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dicha cirugía, como la conocemos en la actualidad, ha demostrado ser altamente efectiva para la corrección de la hipoacusia conductiva por otoesclerosis. Se ha corroborado que en más del 90% de los casos se logra una ganancia auditiva que deja una brecha residual menor a 10 dB y sólo aproximadamente 1-2% se complican con anacusia (2,3,4). Hay casos, sin embargo, que requieren una cirugía de revisión, lo que implica un reto mayor para obtener resultados audiológicos satisfactorios y evitar complicaciones.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified