2017
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201701282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ester Synthesis in Water: Mycobacterium smegmatis Acyl Transferase for Kinetic Resolutions

Abstract: The acyl transferase from Mycobacterium smegmatis (MsAcT) catalyses transesterification reactions in aqueous media because of its hydrophobic active site. Aliphatic cyanohydrin and alkyne esters can be synthesised in water with excellent and strikingly opposite enantioselectivity [(R);E>37 and (S);E>100, respectively]. When using this enzyme, the undesired hydrolysis of the acyl donor is an important factor to take into account. Finally, the choice of acyl donor can significantly influence the obtained e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
78
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculations predict the barrier for the S enantiomer to be 12.1 kcal mol −1 , relative to E‐Ac⋅ ( R )‐ 1 Up , whereas the barrier for the R enantiomer is calculated to be 17.1 kcal mol −1 , relative to the same starting structure. This result is in agreement with the experimental finding that MsAcT favors the S enantiomer of this substrate, with a measured E value of 63, corresponding to an energy difference of about 2 kcal mol −1 under the experimental conditions . The calculated energy difference of 5.0 kcal mol −1 is thus consistent with this, but somewhat overestimated, which could be due to the slight rigidity of the employed active‐site model.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Calculations predict the barrier for the S enantiomer to be 12.1 kcal mol −1 , relative to E‐Ac⋅ ( R )‐ 1 Up , whereas the barrier for the R enantiomer is calculated to be 17.1 kcal mol −1 , relative to the same starting structure. This result is in agreement with the experimental finding that MsAcT favors the S enantiomer of this substrate, with a measured E value of 63, corresponding to an energy difference of about 2 kcal mol −1 under the experimental conditions . The calculated energy difference of 5.0 kcal mol −1 is thus consistent with this, but somewhat overestimated, which could be due to the slight rigidity of the employed active‐site model.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Indeed, we have recalculated the two selectivity‐determining TSs for 1‐methyl propargyl alcohol ( 3 ; Scheme ) and the energy difference drops from 5.0 to 1.7 kcal mol −1 in favor of the S enantiomer (structures are given in the Supporting Information). This is in agreement with the measured E value for this substrate of only 15 (corresponding to an energy difference of about 1.4 kcal mol −1 ), compared with the E value of 63 for 1 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations