2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esthetic evaluation of lip position in silhouette with respect to profile divergence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In straight, anterior, and posterior divergences, Image C with average lip position was regarded the most preferred lip position, and Image E with +4 mm lip protrusion was considered the least preferred lip position among orthodontists, dentists, and laypeople, which is comparable to the study done by Zarif Najafi et al . [ 13 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In straight, anterior, and posterior divergences, Image C with average lip position was regarded the most preferred lip position, and Image E with +4 mm lip protrusion was considered the least preferred lip position among orthodontists, dentists, and laypeople, which is comparable to the study done by Zarif Najafi et al . [ 13 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image E (followed by Image A) was shown to be the least appealing lip position in anterior divergent males and females in all three groups, which is consistent with the findings of Zarif Najafi et al . [ 13 ] The most appealing lip position was Image C, followed by Image B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sv -PRT (mm) <0,001 média ± DP 75,7 ± 5,9 85,6 ± 5 Sv -A' (mm) <0,001 média ± DP 85 ± 6,7 95,7 ± 5,3 Sv -Ls (mm) <0,001 média ± DP 88,2 ± 6,7 100 ± 5,6 Sv -Li (mm) <0,001 média ± DP 86,8 ± 6,2 97,9 ± 5,4 Sv -B' (mm) <0,001 média ± DP 81 ± 6 90,5 ± 5,3 Sv -Pg' (mm) <0,001 média ± DP 83,9 ± 6,4 93,1 ± 5,7 O perfil facial proporcional e equilibrado associado ao correto posicionamento dentário e funcional entre as arcadas são objetivos básicos do tratamento ortodôntico (Bishara et al, 1985;Bergman, 1993;Maple et al, 2005). Porém, o diagnóstico de harmonia facial e a obtenção desta, pode ser considerada uma tarefa desafiadora, devido à natureza subjetiva da avaliação e percepção da estética facial Bergman, 1993;Maple et al, 2005;Rino Neto;2006 (Downs, 1948;Ricketts, 1957;Burstone, 1958;Marrifield, 1966;Holdaway, 1983;McNamara,1984;Bishara et al, 1985;Czarnecki et al, 1993;Bergman, 1993;Arnett et al, 1999;Spyropoulos;Halazonetis, 2001), e a importância do equilíbrio entre o nariz, lábios e mento, parece ser um concenso entre os autores (Ricketts, 1957;Marrifield, 1966;Holdaway, 1983;McNamara, 1984;Bishara et al, 1985;Czarnecki et al, 1993;Bergman, 1993;Maple et al, 2005, Coleman et al, 2007Naini et al, 2012;Modarai et al, 2013;Park et al, 2013;Najafi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A importância de haver um correto posicionamento anteroposterior dos lábios para a estética facial, vêm sendo enfatizado por diversos autores (Ricketts, 1957;Burstone, 1958;Marrifield, 1966;Burstone, 1967;Holdaway, 1983;Bishara et al, 1985;Hsu, 1993;Czarnecki et al, 1993;Maple et al, 2005;Coleman et al, 2007;Modarai et al, 2013;Park et al, 2013;Najafi et al, 2016;Kuhn et al, 2016), e tanto para ortodontistas quanto para leigos, parece ser um fator decisivo na aceitação visual de um perfil facial.…”
Section: Métodounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation