2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982008001100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimação de parâmetros genéticos em tamanho de leitegada de suínos utilizando análises de características múltiplas

Abstract: RESUMO-Registros de animais da raça Large White foram utilizados para estimar componentes de co-variâncias e parâmetros genéticos para a característica número de leitões nascidos como medida do tamanho de leitegada. Na obtenção dos componentes de co-variâncias e dos parâmetros genéticos, utilizou-se o método da Máxima Verossimilhança Restrita, com o algoritmo Livre de Derivadas, por meio do programa MTDFREML. O modelo misto continha o efeito fixo de grupo contemporâneo e os efeitos aleatórios genético aditivo … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Esse fato sugere a existência de diferentes bases genéticas atuando no tamanho da leitegada ao longo da vida reprodutiva das porcas (Barbosa et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…2). Esse fato sugere a existência de diferentes bases genéticas atuando no tamanho da leitegada ao longo da vida reprodutiva das porcas (Barbosa et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…See et al (1993), studying three purebred breeds and using a model that only included first parity records, observed heritability estimates for number of pigs born alive of about 0.13. Ferraz & Johnson (1993) reported heritabilities of 0.14 for number of piglets born alive in Large White pigs using a model that only included additive effects and Barbosa et al (2008), using data from the first four parities of Large White sows, estimated heritabilities in single and multiple trait analyses ranged from 0.14 to 0.20. These results are similar to those found in the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variations are due to the number and quality of the records and the models and estimation methods used. Additionally, there are some controversies in the literature as to whether litter size in different parities should be considered as repeated measurements of the same trait (Southwood & Kennedy, 1990;See et al, 1993;Crump et al, 1997;Lourenço et al, 2008) or as different traits (Irgang et al, 1994;Roehe & Kennedy, 1995;Rydhmer et al, 1995;Barbosa et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in reproductive efficiency has been observed over the last few decades, mainly as a result of genetic improvement of the herds. Among reproduction traits, reproductive performance, especially the number of piglets per litter, is fundamental for the success of pig production, where the increase in prolificity reduces production costs (Barbosa et al, 2008). However, this trait is sex-limited and shows low heritability of about 0.10 (Chen et al, 2003) and 0.22 (Torres-Filho et al, 2005), which represents a strong candidate for marker-assisted selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning to litter size, two factors are intimately related, ovulation rate and embryo survival or mortality. The ovulation rate refers to the number of oocytes released during the estrus period and it is one of the most important components of prolificity (Caetano et al, 2003). Because of this, the study of gene expression in ovarian follicular cells during different phases of the estrus cycle may have a high impact on the understanding of the reproductive biology of the swine, leading to the improvement of ovulation rates and consequently to an increase in litter size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%