ESTIMACIÓN DE BIOMASA Y CARBONO EN Elaeis guineensis Jacq. EN DOS SUELOS CONTRASTANTES DE LA PLANICIE COSTERA DE CHIAPAS

Abstract

<p><strong>Background.</strong> Oil palm has the potential to capture and store CO<sub>2</sub>, however, its growth is influenced by the environment. <strong>Objective</strong>. Estimate the biomass and the amount of carbon in the stem, leaves and roots of <em>Elaeis guineensis</em> Jacq. on two contrasting soils of the Chiapas Coast. <strong>Methodology.</strong> Biomass was sampled for organ estimation using the allometric model Y = bX<sup>k</sup> in its linear form. Carbon content was obtained in stem, leaves and roots<strong>. Results. </strong>The total biomass increased 42% in Huehuetan with cambisol soil compared to the Acapetahua site with fluvisol soil. The total biomass and stem and leaf ratio presents (R<sup>2</sup>) of 95 and 94%. The percentage of carbon was higher in stem, followed by leaf and root system. In total, the amount was 524.27 in Huehuetan and 315.75 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>.plant<sup>-1</sup> in Acapetahua. The CO<sub>2</sub> equivalence in biomass by plants in Huehuetan was 266.72 and 142.14 Mg of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent.ha<sup>-1</sup> for Acapetahua. <strong>Implications.</strong> The study was limited to two regions with particular environmental characteristics, therefore, the climate and soil differences induce variation in biomass and carbon estimates. <strong>Conclusions</strong>. The variations between biomass and carbon estimates are influenced by soil type. A significant relationship was found between plant height and the biometric variables of the stem, leaf and root and the total biomass. The amount of carbon stored varied depending on the age, height of the palms and the density of the plantation. The stem was the organ of the plant with the highest carbon content.</p>

Almacenamiento De Carbono en La Biomasa Arbórea Y El Suelo en Sistemas Silvopastoriles Del Trópico Húmedo

“…Estas diferencias podrían atribuirse a una mayor profundidad de muestreo, en nuestro estudio los muestreos se realizaron hasta 100 cm de profundidad, mientras que en los estudios antes mencionados la profundidad de muestreo fue hasta los 30 cm. Nuestros hallazgos son consistentes con lo reportado por Cardinael et al (2017); Guzmán-Camposeco et al (2021) y Ferreiro-Domínguez et al (2022 quienes encontraron mayor almacenamiento de COS cuando los sitios son evaluados hasta los 100 cm de profundidad; lo cual también depende de las prácticas de manejo, uso y tipo de suelo y de la diversidad de especies arbóreas del sistema. Asimismo, Osei et al (2017) señalan que la distribución del COS en las capas más profundas del suelo (después de los 40 -50 cm) es influenciada por el tipo de vegetación sobre el suelo.…”