2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005jd006668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimate of satellite‐derived cloud optical thickness and effective radius errors and their effect on computed domain‐averaged irradiances

Abstract: [1] The process of retrieving cloud optical thickness and effective radius from radiances measured by satellite instruments is simulated to determine the error in both the retrieved properties and in the irradiances computed with them. The radiances at 0.64 mm and 3.7 mm are computed for three cloud fields (stratus, stratocumulus, and cumulus) generated by large eddy simulation models. When overcast pixels are assumed and the horizontal flux is neglected in the retrieval process, the error in the domain-averag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings have not to be confused with results of others on the impact of cloud inhomogeneity and 3-D effects on effective radius retrievals, which are valid for effective radius values in the range of cloud particles (e.g. Marshak et al, 2006;Kato et al, 2006). Here the result is dominated by the pixels with drizzle sized particles and thus very large effective radii and the way the particular retrieval deals with these areas of very low optical thickness.…”
Section: Complex Case: Scattered Cumuluscontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings have not to be confused with results of others on the impact of cloud inhomogeneity and 3-D effects on effective radius retrievals, which are valid for effective radius values in the range of cloud particles (e.g. Marshak et al, 2006;Kato et al, 2006). Here the result is dominated by the pixels with drizzle sized particles and thus very large effective radii and the way the particular retrieval deals with these areas of very low optical thickness.…”
Section: Complex Case: Scattered Cumuluscontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…In this context the apparent differences to results of Marshak et al (2006) or Kato et al (2006) have to be mentioned once more. While these also evaluate the impact of 3-D effects and inhomogeneity on effective radius retrievals by means of LES cloud data and 3-D radiative transfer simulations, they investigate cloud particle sized effective radius variations and idealized, exemplary retrievals.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 could arise for many reasons. In some cases of low LWP, the clouds are broken or scattered and R e is likely overestimated while τ c may be too small (Kato et al, 2006). It is also possible that the extinction from BB aerosols above the cloud could affect the retrieval of τ c and R e from satellite (Haywood et al, 2003;Wilcox et al, 2009) by reducing the reflectance at several wavelengths, especially for thin clouds.…”
Section: First Indirect Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cloud albedo is not derived from a single view as computed in Kato et al (2006) at 1 km x 1 km but from every viewing angles. The multi-angular capabilities of POLDER allow then averaging of the different values using a directional weighting function.…”
Section: Description Of the Synthetic Generated Clouds And Radiative mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kato et al (2006) analyzed in addition the error on the cloud albedo, which is an important parameter for cloud radiative budget studies. At 1 km pixel size, they found significant errors ranging between -0.3% to 14% (-5% to 30%) from nadir (oblique view) depending on the cloud heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%