1998
DOI: 10.1128/aac.42.2.478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimate of the Frequency of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor Resistance within Unselected Virus Populations In Vitro

Abstract: The frequency of drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variants in virus populations not previously exposed to drug was determined in vitro by using HIV-1RF and the protease inhibitor SC-55389A. Two variants with single mutations responsible for drug resistance (V82A and N88S) were quantifiably isolated after only one round of replication, yielding a crude frequency estimate of at least 1 SC-55389A-resistant variant per 3.5 × 105wild-type infectious units.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially important given the dependence of on the frequency of resistance mutations: our model predicts that for infections where resistance rates are high ( ) may be negative (antagonistic), favoring the use of antagonistic drug pairs over mildly synergistic or even purely additive antibiotic combinations. Indeed, for the modified Jumbe et al model that we study, is nearly additive; and while the resistance frequency we use may be an overestimate (Jumbe et al determined this as the rate of all mutations conferring only a 3-fold increase in the MIC), these and higher mutation rates have been identified in human pathogens [35] , [36] . Together, the potential for strong competition and high mutation rates in infection suggest that the tradeoff and synergy ceiling behaviors observed in our model – as well as the ability of antagonistic drug pairs to minimize multi-drug resistance – may describe the properties of some clinical infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is especially important given the dependence of on the frequency of resistance mutations: our model predicts that for infections where resistance rates are high ( ) may be negative (antagonistic), favoring the use of antagonistic drug pairs over mildly synergistic or even purely additive antibiotic combinations. Indeed, for the modified Jumbe et al model that we study, is nearly additive; and while the resistance frequency we use may be an overestimate (Jumbe et al determined this as the rate of all mutations conferring only a 3-fold increase in the MIC), these and higher mutation rates have been identified in human pathogens [35] , [36] . Together, the potential for strong competition and high mutation rates in infection suggest that the tradeoff and synergy ceiling behaviors observed in our model – as well as the ability of antagonistic drug pairs to minimize multi-drug resistance – may describe the properties of some clinical infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%