1996
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)81473-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
110
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
110
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 1.2 × 10 7 possible codon-changing BPSs in the E. coli ge- (7,27), which is, at most, only a fourth of the total mutation rate observed here. The rate of beneficial mutations is even lower, and, in addition, most beneficial and deleterious mutations have only small (<3%) effects on fitness (7,27). Taken together, our results with the wild-type strain are consistent with these findings and support the basic premise that the MA protocol minimizes selection and allows mutations to accumulate in a nearly neutral fashion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 1.2 × 10 7 possible codon-changing BPSs in the E. coli ge- (7,27), which is, at most, only a fourth of the total mutation rate observed here. The rate of beneficial mutations is even lower, and, in addition, most beneficial and deleterious mutations have only small (<3%) effects on fitness (7,27). Taken together, our results with the wild-type strain are consistent with these findings and support the basic premise that the MA protocol minimizes selection and allows mutations to accumulate in a nearly neutral fashion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection within a colony is minimal because most new mutations arise during the last few generations of growth when the population is large. Furthermore, the great majority of mutations have no fitness effects, and of those that do, the effects are small (6)(7)(8)(9). The application of whole-genome sequencing to MA lines has made this protocol an extremely valuable way to determine a complete and nearly unbiased picture of mutation profiles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic drift in single-cell bottlenecked lines of E. coli is strong enough to prevent the operation of selection on all but mutations with very large effects (31), and numerous prior studies of this sort have validated the effectively nonselective nature of MA experiments (27,28,33,38,39). However, to directly test whether selection might have biased the mutation rate/spectrum (e.g., by enriching for mutations conferring norfloxacin resistance), we examined the synonymous and nonsynonymous status of each coding-region BPS (Dataset S1, Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MA experiments using bacteria are performed by repeatedly passing large numbers of initially identical lines through single-cell bottlenecks, a procedure that prevents natural selection from promoting or eradicating nearly all mutations, except the small subset with extremely large effects (31). This MA/WGS procedure provides an essentially unbiased, genomewide view of the rate and full molecular spectrum of mutations, and has yielded accurate estimates of these features in a wide variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes (27,28,(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually a threshold is crossed, and the population spirals into extinction via a ''mutational meltdown,'' as can be seen in ciliated protozoans and fibroblast cultures, for example (Smith and Pereira-Smith 1977;Tagaki and Yoshida 1980). Mutation-accumulation (MA) experiments have been used effectively for .40 years to address questions related to the buildup of deleterious mutations in populations such as those of Arabidopsis, Caenorhabditis elegans, Daphnia, Drosophila, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and others (reviewed in Mukai 1964;Kibota and Lynch 1996;Lynch and Walsh 1998;Schultz et al 1999;Pfrender and Lynch 2000;Zeyl et al 2001;Estes et al 2004). A species lineage is propagated in a very controlled environment over a large number of generations and is typically forced through a bottleneck in size each generation to exacerbate the effects of random genetic drift.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%