2018
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.01.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimate risk difference and number needed to treat in survival analysis

Abstract: The hazard ratio (HR) is a measure of instantaneous relative risk of an increase in one unit of the covariate of interest, which is widely reported in clinical researches involving time-to-event data. However, the measure fails to capture absolute risk reduction. Other measures such as number needed to treat (NNT) and risk difference (RD) provide another perspective on the effectiveness of an intervention, and can facilitate clinical decision making. The article aims to provide a step-by-step tutorial on how t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cumulative incidence difference (CID) of diabetes at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months since treatment were compared between treatment groups, using the weighted cox model adjusted for non-balanced variables after IPTW [21,22]. The 95% CIs for CID were estimated using bootstrap methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulative incidence difference (CID) of diabetes at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months since treatment were compared between treatment groups, using the weighted cox model adjusted for non-balanced variables after IPTW [21,22]. The 95% CIs for CID were estimated using bootstrap methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 35 Corresponding 95% CIs for cumulative incidence, risk difference and NNS estimates were derived through bootstrapping with 1000 replications. 36 We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate YCRC hazard ratios (HRs). Follow-up of each matched cluster started on index date and continued until YCRC diagnosis or first censoring date.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the adjusted risk differences of statin therapy were calculated for 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. 26 Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to compensate for missing values in ASA classification using a proportional odds model; this resulted in 5 imputed data sets. All imputations were performed before calculating the probability of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%