1979
DOI: 10.2172/6187333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated airborne release of plutonium from Westinghouse Cheswick site as a result of postulated damage from severe wind and seismic hazard

Abstract: The potential airborne releases of plutonium (source terms) from postulated damage sustained by the Westinghouse Plutonium Fuel Development Laboratories at the Cheswick site in Pennsylvania as a result of various levels of wind and seismic hazard are estimated. The source terms are based on damage scenarios originated by other specialists and range up to 260 mph for wind hazard and in excess of 0.39 g ground acceleration for seismic hazard. The approaches and factors used to estimate the source terms (inventor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pea~ ground ~cceleration levels from 0.09 to 0.18 g were assumed for Earthquake No.2, from 0.18 to 0.25 g for Earthquake No.3, and greater than 0.39 g for Earthquake No.4. Significant damage was not postulated for Earthquake No.1 (less than 0.09 g) (Mishima et al 1979).…”
Section: Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Pea~ ground ~cceleration levels from 0.09 to 0.18 g were assumed for Earthquake No.2, from 0.18 to 0.25 g for Earthquake No.3, and greater than 0.39 g for Earthquake No.4. Significant damage was not postulated for Earthquake No.1 (less than 0.09 g) (Mishima et al 1979).…”
Section: Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(a)Taken from Mishima et al (1979). Only the quantity released in the respirable particle size range (less than 10 ~m) was used to calculate doses.…”
Section: Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations