2001
DOI: 10.1037/0893-164x.15.4.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated blood alcohol levels reached by "binge" and "nonbinge" drinkers: A survey of young adults in Montana.

Abstract: The authors examined estimated blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) reached by so-called "binge drinkers" and "nonbinge drinkers" using a survey of young adults (age 18-24 years) in Montana. One third of drinkers were classified as "binge drinkers" the last time they consumed alcohol, using a gender-specific definition commonly applied to young adults: for men, having 5 or more drinks in a row, and for women, having 4 or more drinks. BAC levels were estimated on the basis of length of drinking episode, gender, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Perkins, DeJong, and Linkenbach (2001), "Research literature does not provide a justification for a singular focus on a cutoff point of 5+/4+ drinks" (p. 317). Risk-function analyses, which use "typical" volume rather than heavy consumption on a single occasion, have failed to pinpoint the best threshold for prediction of negative consequences (Midanik et al, 1996;Room, Bondy, & Ferris, 1995;Wechsler et al, 1995;Weitzman & Nelson, 2004 The present study took an empirical approach to determination of the threshold for HED that maximally predicted both proximal and distal adverse-drinking-related outcomes.…”
Section: Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Perkins, DeJong, and Linkenbach (2001), "Research literature does not provide a justification for a singular focus on a cutoff point of 5+/4+ drinks" (p. 317). Risk-function analyses, which use "typical" volume rather than heavy consumption on a single occasion, have failed to pinpoint the best threshold for prediction of negative consequences (Midanik et al, 1996;Room, Bondy, & Ferris, 1995;Wechsler et al, 1995;Weitzman & Nelson, 2004 The present study took an empirical approach to determination of the threshold for HED that maximally predicted both proximal and distal adverse-drinking-related outcomes.…”
Section: Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the existence of this consumption pattern has been acknowledged, a consensus among researchers is not appreciated, either in the definition or in the criteria that determine the consumption (Jackson, 2008;Lange & Voas, 2001;Marczinski, Comb, & Fillmore, 2007;Perkins, DeJong, & Linkenbach, 2001;Wagner et al, 2007;Wechsler & Nelson, 2001). Under terms such as "binge drinking", "heavy episodic drinking", "high-risk drinking", "risky drinking", "excessive episodic consumption", "alcohol intensive consumption episodes", "concentrated consumption", "binge consumption", they are referring to several aspects, such as the measure of the alcohol consumed in grams or in the number of consumptions, the frequency of the consumption, or the time interval in which the substance is ingested, to mention some.…”
Section: Palabras Clave: Botellón Consumo Intensivo De Alcohol Análmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this rate, it only takes ~2 min for the concentration in the slice chamber to reach 50 mM. Even heavy binge drinking does not raise blood ethanol levels to 50 mM in such a short time (Lange and Voas, 2001;Perkins et al, 2001). To examine the effects of more gradual increases in ethanol such as might occur during a bout of binge drinking, we used a protocol in which a final concentration of 60 mM was achieved by stepwise increases of 10 mM every 15 min.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%