2006
DOI: 10.1121/1.2226559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated communication range of social sounds used by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

Abstract: Bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, exhibit flexible associations in which the compositions of groups change frequently. We investigated the potential distances over which female dolphins and their dependent calves could remain in acoustic contact. We quantified the propagation of sounds in the frequency range of typical dolphin whistles in shallow water areas and channels of Sarasota Bay, Florida. Our results indicated that detection range was noise limited as opposed to being limited by hearing sensitiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At short ranges, this corresponds well with the transmission loss predicted using the Marsh and Shulkin (1962) model for continuous sounds as employed by Janik (2000) and Miller (2006). The existence of sound channels might increase the transmission of signals drastically for very specific frequencies (Quintana-Rizzo et al, 2006). However, sound transmission in such channels is often unpredictable and varied, and received levels can change quickly even over short distances and depths (QuintanaRizzo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At short ranges, this corresponds well with the transmission loss predicted using the Marsh and Shulkin (1962) model for continuous sounds as employed by Janik (2000) and Miller (2006). The existence of sound channels might increase the transmission of signals drastically for very specific frequencies (Quintana-Rizzo et al, 2006). However, sound transmission in such channels is often unpredictable and varied, and received levels can change quickly even over short distances and depths (QuintanaRizzo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Noise levels in this study were obtained under ideal, lownoise conditions (Sea State 0: flat sea with no vessels and no wind), so if anything, the active space will likely be lower than reported here due to increased noise from wind, waves and rain. Together, these results imply that communication range of tropical, coastal dolphins is inherently short-range where 50% of the whistles are unlikely to be detected beyond a range of 800 m, more than an order of magnitude lower than some previous estimates for delphinids (Janik, 2000;Miller, 2006), and much closer to the ranges estimated in Sarasota Bay (Quintana-Rizzo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sounds below 1 kHz (typical of mysticete calls) have significantly less seawater absorption loss than sounds above 10 kHz (typical of odontocete calls) and thus can be detected at greater distances . Mysticete calls are commonly detected at ranges of several tens of kilometres on a single hydrophone , while odontocete clicks and whistles can be detected at ranges of 1 -6 km (Quintana-Rizzo et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2006;Jensen et al, 2012;Ainslie, 2013). Stafford et al (2012a) and Marcoux et al (2012) discuss the large overlap in vocal repertoires of the two Monodontid species (beluga whales and narwhals) that share migration routes in Baffin Bay (Heide-Jørgensen et al, 2003a, c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the active space of a sound depends (among other factors such as its frequency) on bottom substrate and water depth. For example, the same call is perceived at less than 200 m in a shallow sea grass area of 1.6 m depth, but up to more than 6 km in a sandy bottom area of 3.5 m depth (Quintana-Rizzo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%