2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated connectivity networks outperform observed connectivity networks when classifying people with multiple sclerosis into disability groups

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested (Tian et al, 2021 ) that the parameter coefficients of the prediction models can be unreliable to assess the feature importance. Therefore, similar to our recent work that compared the prediction ability of observed vs. estimated SC and FC networks in classifying pwMS by disability status (Tozlu et al, 2021 ), here we report the important features that had high feature weight from the classification models and that also showed a larger difference in the mass univariate group comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It has been suggested (Tian et al, 2021 ) that the parameter coefficients of the prediction models can be unreliable to assess the feature importance. Therefore, similar to our recent work that compared the prediction ability of observed vs. estimated SC and FC networks in classifying pwMS by disability status (Tozlu et al, 2021 ), here we report the important features that had high feature weight from the classification models and that also showed a larger difference in the mass univariate group comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…3,4 FMRI in pwMS has largely been used to investigate the association between the brain's static and/or dynamic functional connectivity (FC) and motor/cognitive impairment. [5][6][7] The majority of FC studies have assumed that the FC is static 3,4 and have ignored shorter scale changes of brain network activity that have been shown to occur. 8 The dynamic FC (dFC) approach captures recurrent co-fluctuation states by clustering dynamic FC matrices computed over sliding windows of BOLD time series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the contribution of these delayed network disruption mechanisms is likely to be minor in the timeframe up to 36 h after stroke studied here. Moreover, despite this methodological limitation, NeMo, the particular toolbox used in this study, has been shown repeatedly to produce clinically and anatomically valid estimates of structural disconnection (Kuceyeski et al, 2014(Kuceyeski et al, , 2015(Kuceyeski et al, , 2016Olafson et al, 2021;Respino et al, 2019;Tozlu et al, 2021). Thus, while indirect network mapping only provides surrogate markers of true neuronal disconnection and is contingent on both the validity of the tractography algorithm performed in the underlying reference population and the assumption that lesion-induced effects exceed inter-individual variability in white matter structure, it has significant utility in situations in which subject-specific diffusion imaging, tractography and network reconstruction cannot be performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%