2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated cost efficacy of systemic treatments that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed at selected study sites, and peripheral blood samples were collected from a subgroup of subjects from each cohort at the following time points: predose (time 0) and 1, 2, 4,6,8,12,16,18, and 24 h after dosing on day 1 of month 1. For cytokine evaluation, peripheral blood samples were collected from all patients at baseline (predose), after 4, 8, and 12 wk of treatment with KD025, and at the follow-up visit, that is, 30 d after the last dosing with the drug.…”
Section: Peripheral Blood Sample Collection and Cytokine Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed at selected study sites, and peripheral blood samples were collected from a subgroup of subjects from each cohort at the following time points: predose (time 0) and 1, 2, 4,6,8,12,16,18, and 24 h after dosing on day 1 of month 1. For cytokine evaluation, peripheral blood samples were collected from all patients at baseline (predose), after 4, 8, and 12 wk of treatment with KD025, and at the follow-up visit, that is, 30 d after the last dosing with the drug.…”
Section: Peripheral Blood Sample Collection and Cytokine Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of aforementioned biologics for psoriasis and other chronic autoimmune disorders can be limited by long-term safety issues, such as an increase rate of infections due to the central role of IL-17 in protection against Candida (8-10). Additionally, biologic therapies are costly compared with traditional systemic therapy and are administrated via injection, which may limit patient acceptability (11,12). Thus, the development of new oral therapies remains important and can offer an alternative risk-benefit profile via modulation of specific disease-associated cellular pathways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Cheaper biosimilars (drugs designed to have the same pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties as their previously licensed reference drugs) are available, but were not tested in patients with psoriasis. 3,4 Most regulatory agencies have approved the use of infliximab biosimilars for the treatment of psoriasis by extrapolating efficacy from studies in other diseases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] Because the aforementioned FDA-approved mAbs find their utility and efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, they are widely prescribed, and the associated financial burden is increasing. 20 The biosimilars for the 3 anti-TNF-a etanercept (Erelzi; Sandoz, Holzkirchen, Germany), adalimumab (Amjevita; Amgen), and infliximab (Inflectra; Hospira, Lake Forest, Ill) have been officially FDA approved since 2016 and represent a potential cost savings. [21][22][23] Biologics are large and complex molecules that can never be exactly duplicated because of their inherent variability.…”
Section: Psoriasismentioning
confidence: 99%