2016
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20166104020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated Daily Global Radiation for Zhengzhou and Its Comparison With Observations

Abstract: Abstract. Three models relating daily global solar radiation to sunshine duration has been investigated in order to estimate daily global radiation for Zhengzhou, China. The data from January 1995 to December 2004 have been used in the models. Comparison of the estimated and measured values showed that the cubic model was able to estimate global radiation at high daily global solar radiation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M. Ozturk (2015) established linear, quadratic, cubic, and power function models for Isparta, Turkey, and the cubic model predicted the best results. Liu et al (2016) established linear, quadratic, and cubic equations for Zhengzhou, China by using the data between January 1995 and December 2004, and the cubic model predicted better results than other models. Ishola et al (2019) modified the various model coefficients for Ireland, and the results show that the quadratic model works best.…”
Section: A Review Of Global Solar Radiation Estimation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…M. Ozturk (2015) established linear, quadratic, cubic, and power function models for Isparta, Turkey, and the cubic model predicted the best results. Liu et al (2016) established linear, quadratic, and cubic equations for Zhengzhou, China by using the data between January 1995 and December 2004, and the cubic model predicted better results than other models. Ishola et al (2019) modified the various model coefficients for Ireland, and the results show that the quadratic model works best.…”
Section: A Review Of Global Solar Radiation Estimation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…,Uckan and Khudhur (2018),Kada et al (2018),Zhang et al (2018),Akpootu et al (2019),Ishola et al (2019),Khan and Ahmad (2019),Manju and Sandeep (2019),Pant et al (2019),Samanta et al (2019), Shahrukh Anis et al (2019,Kaplan and Kaplan. (2020),Nadjem et al (2020),Saud et al (2020),Xiao et al (2020) S3H H 0 [a + b( S S0 ) + c( S S0 ) 2 + d( S S0 ) 3 ] Bahel et al (1987),Samuel (1991),Lewis (1992), Togrul et al (2000b, Toğrul, 2002, Rensheng et al (2006),Ulgen and Hepbasli (2004),Almorox and Hontoria (2004),Jin et al (2005),Aras et al (2006),Rensheng et al (2006),Katiyar and Pandey (2010),Duzen and Aydin (2012),Assi and Jama (2010),Ouali and Alkama (2014),Onyango and Ongoma (2015),Ozturk (2015),Akinnawo et al (2016),Sarkar and Sifat (2016),Liu et al (2016),Gong et al (2016),Yang et al (2016),Ayodele and Ogynjuyigbe (2017),Kaplan (2018), Achour et al (2017), Bakirci (2017), Cao et al (2017), Benamrou et al (2018), Gouda et al (2018), Uckan and Khudhur (2018), Kada et al (2018), Zhang et al (2018), Siva Krishna Rao et al (2018), Akpootu et al (2019), Khan and Ahmad (2019), Manju and Sandeep (2019), Pant et al (2019), Pant et al (2019), Samanta et al (2019), Feng et al (2020), Kaplan and Kaplan. (2020), Nadjem et al (2020), Saud et al (2020) S4 H H 0 [a + blog( S S0 + 1)] Ampratwum and Dorvlo (1999), Almorox and Hontoria (2004), Togrul et al (2000a), Bakirci (2009), Duzen and Aydin (2012), Assi and Jama (2010), Yao et al (2014), Onyango and Ongoma (2015), Sarkar and Sifat (2016), Ayodele and Ogynjuyigbe (2017), Kaplan and Kaplan (2020), ...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation