1994
DOI: 10.2307/3889167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated Living Statures of Dated Khoisan Skeletons from the South-Western Coastal Region of South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Later Stone Age sample used in this study is derived from archaeological contexts from several coastal or near-coastal sites dating from 11,000 to 2000 BP (Morris, 1992;Sealy et al, 1992;Churchill and Morris, 1998;Wilson and Lundy, 1994;Sealy and Pfeiffer, 2000). At ca.…”
Section: Later Stone Age Southern African and Andamanese Foragersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Later Stone Age sample used in this study is derived from archaeological contexts from several coastal or near-coastal sites dating from 11,000 to 2000 BP (Morris, 1992;Sealy et al, 1992;Churchill and Morris, 1998;Wilson and Lundy, 1994;Sealy and Pfeiffer, 2000). At ca.…”
Section: Later Stone Age Southern African and Andamanese Foragersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have used smaller samples to explore variability in body size in the Cape during the Holocene. Wilson and Lundy (1994) published a pilot study of 45 femora from dated, prehistoric skeletons, mainly from the western region, concluding that prehistoric statures were comparable to historically documented statures for Bushmen. Wilson and Lundy (1994, p. 7) further noted ''some evidence of diachronic change in the statures of both the female and male samples, with a decrease after 3000 BP and an increase after 2000 BP.''…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This study examines the applicability of several current body size estimation methods to a sample of Later Stone Age adult skeletons. Stature of Later Stone Age samples has been estimated and examined by previous researchers (Lundy, 1986;Smith et al, 1992;Wilson and Lundy, 1994), but none of these studies has specifically considered the appropriateness of the body size estimation methods employed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%